India's rigid class system, known as the Caste System, divides society into hierarchical groups based on birth. Each caste has designated occupations and social roles, creating social inequalities and discrimination. The system is deeply ingrained in Indian society and has been a source of significant social issues. Efforts to address caste discrimination have been made through affirmative action policies and education initiatives.
Countries with rigid class systems often include India, where the caste system historically defines social hierarchy, and Brazil, where socioeconomic disparities create distinct class divisions. In the United Kingdom, traditional class distinctions persist despite modern influences, affecting social mobility. Other examples include South Africa, where historical apartheid policies have contributed to entrenched class divisions along racial lines.
A Rigid body is defined as a system of particles which does not deform.
Taxonomy is not a rigid or immutable system; it evolves based on new scientific discoveries and advancements. Classification systems can change as more information becomes available, leading to updates in how organisms are grouped and categorized.
a group of people that invaded India and developed the caste system
The metric system was introduced in 1958.
India's caste system is a complex social hierarchy based on birth, with individuals belonging to specific hereditary social categories, whereas the Aryan social class system was a simpler division into four main groups - Brahmins (priests), Kshatriyas (warriors), Vaishyas (merchants), and Shudras (laborers). The caste system in India is more rigid and stratified compared to the Aryan social class system.
India's caste system is a hereditary and rigid social hierarchy based on occupation and birth, with limited social mobility, while China's class system is based on economic status and can be more fluid. In India, one's caste determines their social status and opportunities, while in China, class position is influenced by factors such as education, wealth, and job status. Additionally, the caste system in India has religious connotations and is deeply ingrained in society, whereas the class system in China is more influenced by socialist principles and government policies.
a rigid social class system.
A rigid social class system.
It is called the caste system
This is a statement. A statement can't be answered.
both had a rigid class system
According to experts, the civilization of India and Chinese had the most rigid caste system because of it was difficult for individuals to rise above the social structure they were born in to.
Developed a rigid class structure.
In India, whatever your parents are, you are. Until your next life, you will always be in the same caste. In America, if you get a higher job by being promoted, and you make more money you could go from low class to middle class or middle to high class.
During the postclassical era in India, the caste system was primarily a rigid social system. It was characterized by strict social hierarchy and limited social mobility based on birth. This rigid structure was reinforced by religious beliefs and societal norms.
The social class system and caste system in India are both systems of social stratification based on hereditary aspects. However, the caste system is more rigid and hierarchical, with individuals being born into specific castes that determine their social status and occupation, while the social class system is more fluid and allows for some degree of mobility based on individual achievements and wealth. Additionally, the caste system has a religious basis in Hinduism, while the social class system is more influenced by economic factors.