Yes, in fact nothing in science is ever considered to be 100% without a doubt factual. Gravity is a prime example in the sense that we're not starting to question if gravity is even real because we can not observe it.
Incorrect. In science, a theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is based on a body of evidence and has withstood testing and scrutiny. It is more than a best guess; it is a framework that explains a wide range of phenomena and is supported by multiple lines of evidence.
The theory is based on replicable evidence. This evidence turns a theory into a fact.
There is no scientific evidence or credible theory to suggest that the world will explode or be filled with water in the foreseeable future. These scenarios are typically seen in movies and not based on real scientific knowledge.
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
Beliefs that have a scientific basis are those that are supported by empirical evidence, rigorously tested, and peer-reviewed. Examples include the theory of evolution, the germ theory of disease, and the evidence for climate change caused by human activities.
yes it can
yes it can prove ....
If all the evidence taken into consideration can be explained by the scientific model proposed and the model successfully predicts outcomes of experiments yet to be performed, it is a "good scientific theory" It still can be incorrect. If it is proven incorrect it should be abandoned.
True.
Briefly, the scientific method essentially involves postulating a theory, and then that theory will either stand or fall on the evidence of future experiments.
Yes, new evidence or developments in the future can cause a scientific theory to be revised or even discarded. As our understanding of the world grows and advances, theories must evolve to fit the new information. This process is a fundamental part of the scientific method.
Because technology might change in the future.
First off that's not a word, and any scientific theory can be debunked if a better theory replaces it or the evidence begins to point in a different direction thus debasing the previous theory.
A scientific model can change if new evidence is found. If the new evidence that has been found contradicts the model or theory then a scientific model or theory can change.
Scientific evidence appeal is some form of proof which supports or counters a scientific theory. This is the information that will be used as empirical evidence of a hypothesis.
Yes, a scientific theory should make sense based on available evidence and be able to explain observations and predict future outcomes. A theory that does not make sense or contradicts established scientific principles would likely be considered invalid.
Incorrect. In science, a theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is based on a body of evidence and has withstood testing and scrutiny. It is more than a best guess; it is a framework that explains a wide range of phenomena and is supported by multiple lines of evidence.