answersLogoWhite

0

No, as even the oldest rocks of the Earth's crust have undergone at least some remelting since the first accretion of the planet.

Modern science usually uses various forms of radiometric dating (uranium-lead, potassium-argon and rubidium-strontium are the methods most commonly used for dating rocks) in an attempt to determine the age of minerals in the earth's crust.

However these will usually be used to find the date of crystallisation of a mineral. Many of the rocks forming the crust of the earth will have been remelted at some point during the geologic history of the early earth which effectively acts to reset the radiometric dating clock.

As such the oldest crustal rocks currently known have been dated as around 4.28 billion years of age in Northern Quebec, Canada, along the Hudson's Bay coast, 40 km south of Inukjuak.

And the oldest terrestrial material discovered on Earth to date is a zircon crystal found in Western Australia within a metamorphic gneiss which was part of the Narryer Gneiss Terrane. It has been dated at 4.404 Ga (4.404 billion years old) although the rock itself is younger than this.

However the Earth is estimated to be 4.567 billion years old. These estimates come from chondritic meteorites found on Earth.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Natural Sciences

What was Earths Age According to Geologists?

Earth is estimated to be around 4.5 billion years old, based on radiometric dating of meteorites and rocks from Earth's surface. Geologists have used various dating methods to determine the age of Earth, including studying the decay of radioactive isotopes in rocks and minerals.


Some of the oldest rocks ever found have been estimated to be 3.5 billion years old is t likely that these rocks were present when earth was first formed?

No, it is unlikely that these 3.5 billion-year-old rocks were present at Earth's formation. The Earth is about 4.5 billion years old, and the oldest rocks represent only a fraction of that history. Initially, the Earth was molten, and solid crust formation took place later as the planet cooled. Therefore, the rocks we find today are remnants of processes that occurred after the planet's initial formation.


Why did James hutton reason that the earth is very old?

As Hutton made observations about the rocks in the area where he lived, he began to find clues that most changes on earth happen slowly, and that earth must therefore be very old.


How old is the Earth according to scientific evidence?

The Earth is estimated to be around 4.54 billion years old based on scientific evidence, including radiometric dating of rocks and meteorites. This age has been determined by studying the decay of radioactive isotopes and analyzing the composition of Earth's rocks and minerals.


Where do you find the oldest rock?

The oldest rocks on Earth are usually found in regions known as cratons, which are stable ancient continental landmasses. These rocks can be found in places such as Western Australia, Canada, and South Africa. The oldest known rock on Earth is found in Western Australia and is about 4.4 billion years old.

Related Questions

How long old do scientists believe the earth is?

Scientists estimate that the Earth is around 4.5 billion years old based on radiometric dating of rocks and meteorites. This estimate comes from studying the age of the oldest rocks on Earth and moon samples collected during space missions.


How did scientist find out how old earth was?

Scientists determine the age of the Earth through various methods, including radiometric dating of rocks and meteorites, studying the decay of radioactive isotopes, and analyzing the composition of materials on Earth and in space. These methods provide estimates of Earth's age to be around 4.5 billion years.


When do astronomers blieve the solar system was formed?

By studying rocks from Earth, from the Moon and meteorites it is believed that the age of the Solar System is approximately 4.6 billion years old.


How old is the the earth and how did scientist know?

The Earth is approximately 4.54 billion years old. Scientists determine the age of the Earth through various methods, including radiometric dating of rocks and meteorites, studying the decay of radioactive isotopes, and analyzing the composition of minerals.


Why cant you find rocks 4.5 billion years old?

You can't find rocks 4.5 to 5 billion years ago because the earth was still so hot that it was still liquid and there were no rocks yet.


What was Earths Age According to Geologists?

Earth is estimated to be around 4.5 billion years old, based on radiometric dating of meteorites and rocks from Earth's surface. Geologists have used various dating methods to determine the age of Earth, including studying the decay of radioactive isotopes in rocks and minerals.


Rocks in continental crust are as old as years.?

Rocks in continental crust can be as old as about 4 billion years. This is because the continental crust is made up of a mixture of ancient rocks that have been around since the Earth's early history. By studying these rocks, scientists can learn more about the planet's evolution and geological processes.


How did scientist determined the age of earth?

Scientists have used various methods to determine the age of Earth, including radiometric dating of rocks, studying the decay of radioactive isotopes, and analyzing meteorites. By measuring the ratios of different isotopes in rocks and meteorites, scientists have estimated the age of Earth to be around 4.5 billion years old.


How old are rocks found in Apollo missions?

The moon rocks are older then the rocks found on earth.


Some of the oldest rocks ever found have been estimated to be 3.5 billion years old is t likely that these rocks were present when earth was first formed?

No, it is unlikely that these 3.5 billion-year-old rocks were present at Earth's formation. The Earth is about 4.5 billion years old, and the oldest rocks represent only a fraction of that history. Initially, the Earth was molten, and solid crust formation took place later as the planet cooled. Therefore, the rocks we find today are remnants of processes that occurred after the planet's initial formation.


Why did hutton reason that the earth is very old?

As Hutton made observations about the rocks in the area where he lived, he began to find clues that most changes on earth happen slowly, and that earth must therefore be very old.


Which would be least helpful to scientist trying to find evidence that earth is very old?

Examing contiental drift