How was spontaneous generation disproved twice?

Answer 1

Fransesco Redi: took 3 jars of rotten meat and the 1st was uncovered the second was covered with gauze and the 3rd was sealed with thick parchment. Results: 1. jar number 1 was infested with flies and maggots 2. jar number 2 had fly's eggs laid on top of the gauze 3. jar number 3 attracted no flies because it was sealed off and the flies could not smell it; this disrpoved the theory that flies evolved from rotten meat but in reality only hatched their eggs inside the meat so the maggots (baby flies) could have something to eat after they hatched.

Louis Pasteur: broiled broth and set the broth inside flasks; some were covered and some weren't; the ones uncovered were infested with bacteria and the ones that were covered were not infested with bacteria. Then, he took a flasks with broiled broth inside the flasks and toom them to a mountain top. The results ended as he thought. The bacteria inside the broth was few because of the thin air. the final experiment was with broth uncovered inside a flask that had a zig-zag motion. Results: the bacteria did not infest the broth but settled on the curves of the flask and could not reach the broth.

Without these two scientists (which lived about 200 years ago) the thought of spontaneous generation would have carried on through today; it still did with the stupidity of "so called" evoulutionists which call themselves scientists even thought evoulution is only a faith instead of a science or fact.

Answer 2

Spontaneous generation was disproved first by Francesco Redi in the 17th century, who showed that maggots on decaying meat came from flies laying eggs, not spontaneously generating. Louis Pasteur later performed experiments in the 19th century that definitively proved that microbes do not spontaneously generate but come from preexisting life forms.