The key factor that determines whether a resource is renewable or nonrenewable is the rate at which it can be replenished naturally. Renewable resources can be naturally replenished within a human lifetime, while nonrenewable resources are finite and cannot be easily replaced.
The criteria that determine whether an energy resource is renewable or non-renewable are based on whether the resource can be naturally replenished within a human lifetime. Renewable resources like sunlight, wind, and water can be replenished quickly, while non-renewable resources like fossil fuels take millions of years to form and cannot be easily replaced.
An energy resource is considered renewable if it can be naturally replenished within a human lifetime, such as sunlight, wind, or biomass. Factors that determine if a resource is renewable include its ability to regenerate quickly, its availability in abundance, and its minimal impact on the environment.
Wild animals are self sustaining through reproduction, but they are probably non-renewable, if the primary meaning of renewable is 'inexhaustible'. The estimate is that 99% of all species that ever lived on earth are now extinct. Depending on whether or not they are consumed in some way during their use as a resource, wildlife could be seen as non-renewable.
Yes, that can be done. When we decide whether a resource is renewable or not, that does actually depend upon the rate at which that resource is consumed. Fresh water is a renewable resource in the sense that there is a continuing supply of fresh water, in the form of rain. However it is certainly possible to consume fresh water faster than the rain can replenish it, in which case fresh water is not entirely renewable, and it can still become exhausted (which, of course, has happened in many parts of the world). No resource is completely unlimited. We don't expect to run out of breathable air, yet, it is possible (at least in theory) to have a planetary population so large that the existing green plant life would not be sufficient to replenish the oxygen supply, which would then not be as renewable as it used to be. I can imagine, in principle, that in such a ridiculously overpopulated world, it could become necessary to use electrolysis to manufacture oxygen from water, to make sure we have enough to breathe. Of course, in such a situation we would also have a severe problem getting enough food to eat. Perhaps hunger would get to us before we rain out of oxygen. Sunlight is the ultimate renewable resource, because it is so plentiful and so reliable. But since there is no upper limit to the power consumption of the human race, it is possible that we could capture and utilize all the available sunlight and still not have enough for our needs. I don't really expect that to happen, but it is possible in theory.
Whether or not it's an acid or a base
1.) Because it determines whether or not investing in this particular resource will be practical in the long term. For example, uranium is NOT a renewable resource, which is why fission nuclear energy which uses uranium won't be around too long if only Earth's uranium is used. 2.) Because your homework depends on it.
The primary factor that determines whether a resource is considered nonrenewable is the rate at which it can be replenished. Nonrenewable resources are those that are formed at a much slower rate than they are used, making their supply finite and unsustainable in the long term. Examples include fossil fuels like coal, oil, and natural gas.
The criteria that determine whether an energy resource is renewable or non-renewable are based on whether the resource can be naturally replenished within a human lifetime. Renewable resources like sunlight, wind, and water can be replenished quickly, while non-renewable resources like fossil fuels take millions of years to form and cannot be easily replaced.
A resource is classified as renewable if it can be replenished naturally over a relatively short time frame, such as solar, wind, and biomass energy. In contrast, non-renewable resources are finite and take millions of years to form, such as fossil fuels and minerals. The key determinant is the rate at which the resource can be regenerated compared to the rate of consumption. Sustainability and long-term availability are critical factors in this classification.
In the very far distant future, the sun will eventually burn out. So, one could say that it is non-renewable.
An energy resource is considered renewable if it can be naturally replenished within a human lifetime, such as sunlight, wind, or biomass. Factors that determine if a resource is renewable include its ability to regenerate quickly, its availability in abundance, and its minimal impact on the environment.
Geothermal poweris a renewable source of energy if it is utilised correctly.However if the geothermal resourceisn't managed correctly it can be over-exploited and in which case there are doubts about whether this resource can be truly classed as renewable. Whilst the resource is eventually replenished, it can take many years, and so I would say that geothermal can only be truly classed as a renewable resourceif used correctly, because if not the energy source will be run out.
Rubber is considered a renewable resource because it is derived from latex sap produced by rubber trees. Rubber trees can be replanted and tapped for latex over and over again, making rubber a sustainable and renewable material.
Fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) are non-renewable.They took millions and millions of years to form and are being used up in a time scale of hundreds of years. When they are gone, it will take millions of years again for the processes that create coal and oil to happen.When we use them, they are gone. This is the opposite of renewable sources of energy, like wind and solar, which can be used over and over.
Wild animals are self sustaining through reproduction, but they are probably non-renewable, if the primary meaning of renewable is 'inexhaustible'. The estimate is that 99% of all species that ever lived on earth are now extinct. Depending on whether or not they are consumed in some way during their use as a resource, wildlife could be seen as non-renewable.
Renewable energy is energy created by something that you can use over and over again. and then purple dinosaurs lick volcanic ash out of a volcano and do there mother and urs to. A few instances of this would be electricity created by "Solar Cells" and "Windmills". You never run out of wind and sun like you do fossil fuels (oil).
Whether your foot is on it or not.