0
What else can I help you with?
What Explanations for occurrences in the natural world should be based on .?
Explanations for occurrences in the natural world should be based on empirical evidence, scientific reasoning, and reproducibility. They need to rely on observations and experiments that can be tested and verified, adhering to the principles of the scientific method. Additionally, these explanations should be open to revision as new evidence emerges, ensuring they remain accurate and relevant. This approach fosters a deeper understanding of natural phenomena and promotes critical thinking.
How scientists study the natural world and propose explanations based on evidence is better known as?
The process by which scientists study the natural world and propose explanations based on evidence is known as the scientific method. This systematic approach involves making observations, forming hypotheses, conducting experiments, and analyzing data to draw conclusions. Through repeated testing and peer review, scientific knowledge is refined and validated, leading to a better understanding of natural phenomena.
How scientific theory and scientific law are the same?
They are not the same, theory is just that, it may be provable in some instances, but cannot be positivity applied to all cases, law however can. Their similarity is that they both require some proof, but law needs to be proven to be true for all cases.
What kinds of explanations of nature does science ignore and which does it pursue?
Science primarily ignores explanations based on supernatural or spiritual phenomena that cannot be tested or observed through empirical methods. Science pursues explanations that are based on observable evidence and testable hypotheses, focusing on natural causes and processes to understand the workings of the natural world.
What are the two goals of the scientific discipline?
The first goal is to explain why things occur. The next goal includes identifying and studying patterns to make generalizations.
What Explanations for occurrences in the natural world should be based on .?
Explanations for occurrences in the natural world should be based on empirical evidence, scientific reasoning, and reproducibility. They need to rely on observations and experiments that can be tested and verified, adhering to the principles of the scientific method. Additionally, these explanations should be open to revision as new evidence emerges, ensuring they remain accurate and relevant. This approach fosters a deeper understanding of natural phenomena and promotes critical thinking.
What is the term for a complex explanation of phenomena based on findings from scientific research?
The term for a complex explanation of phenomena based on findings from scientific research is a theory. Scientific theories are well-supported explanations that encompass a wide range of observations, experiments, and data.
How scientists study the natural world and propose explanations based on evidence is better known as?
The process by which scientists study the natural world and propose explanations based on evidence is known as the scientific method. This systematic approach involves making observations, forming hypotheses, conducting experiments, and analyzing data to draw conclusions. Through repeated testing and peer review, scientific knowledge is refined and validated, leading to a better understanding of natural phenomena.
How are a scientific law and a theory similar?
Both scientific laws and theories are explanations of natural phenomena based on empirical evidence. They both strive to describe, predict, and explain specific aspects of the natural world. However, laws are typically concise statements that describe a relationship or pattern, while theories are more comprehensive explanations that incorporate multiple laws and hypotheses.
How are scientific law and scientific theory are the same?
Scientific laws and scientific theories are both established principles in science that explain natural phenomena. Laws describe empirical observations and relationships, while theories provide explanations for why and how those observations occur. Both are fundamental to our understanding of the natural world and are supported by empirical evidence.
Is scientific explanations are always based on empirical evidence?
Yes, scientific explanations are fundamentally based on empirical evidence, which is derived from observations, experiments, and data collection. This reliance on empirical evidence ensures that scientific claims are testable and falsifiable, distinguishing them from beliefs or opinions. While theories may evolve over time, they remain grounded in observable phenomena that can be measured and verified. Thus, the scientific method prioritizes evidence as the foundation for understanding the natural world.
Is it true scientific laws explain why something happens?
Scientific laws describe how natural phenomena behave consistently under certain conditions. They do not explain why things happen or the underlying mechanisms behind the observed behavior. Theories, on the other hand, provide explanations based on tested hypotheses and are used to understand the causes behind observed phenomena.
How scientific theory and scientific law are the same?
They are not the same, theory is just that, it may be provable in some instances, but cannot be positivity applied to all cases, law however can. Their similarity is that they both require some proof, but law needs to be proven to be true for all cases.
What are scientific theory made up of?
Scientific theories are typically composed of well-supported explanations and predictions based on a large body of evidence and rigorous testing. They serve as comprehensive frameworks that explain natural phenomena and guide further research and discovery in a particular field of study.
What statements is true about scientific theories?
Scientific theories are well-substantiated explanations of natural phenomena, based on a body of evidence and observations. They are formulated through rigorous testing and can be modified or refined as new evidence emerges. Unlike hypotheses, which are tentative explanations, theories are widely accepted within the scientific community when they withstand extensive scrutiny and experimentation. Importantly, theories do not become "true" in an absolute sense; rather, they are supported by evidence and are the best available explanations at the time.
What is the explanation how or why something happens based on scientific study?
The explanation of how or why something happens based on scientific study is referred to as a scientific theory or hypothesis. These explanations are derived from systematic observations, experiments, and analysis of data. They aim to provide a coherent understanding of natural phenomena by identifying underlying mechanisms and relationships. Scientific theories are continually tested and refined through further research and experimentation.
What is a true statement of scientific theories?
Scientific theories are well-substantiated explanations of natural phenomena based on evidence and experimentation. They are supported by a wide body of knowledge and have withstood repeated testing and scrutiny by the scientific community. While theories can be refined or expanded upon as new evidence emerges, they are the best explanations we have for understanding the world around us.
