molten material, magnetic stripes, and the ages of the rock.
Not really but sea floor sediments thickness increase with increased distance from spreading centers which is good evidence. Other evidence such as magnetic reversals, temperature, dating methods provide the best evidence of seafloor spreading
people here are stupid , really the answer is not hi
Scientists found evidence of magnetic stripes on the ocean floor, which indicated periodic reversals in Earth's magnetic field. This discovery helped support the theory of plate tectonics and seafloor spreading.
Seismic studies show evidence of mid-ocean ridges where new oceanic crust is forming, supporting the theory of seafloor spreading. By analyzing seismic waves, scientists can map the structure of the ocean floor and identify areas of tectonic activity where plates are moving apart. Additionally, seismic data reveals the presence of magnetic striping on the seafloor, further supporting the idea of seafloor spreading.
the newer rock is closer to the middle n th older ones spread along the sides
dumb question. don't want to write it all
Not really but sea floor sediments thickness increase with increased distance from spreading centers which is good evidence. Other evidence such as magnetic reversals, temperature, dating methods provide the best evidence of seafloor spreading
people here are stupid , really the answer is not hi
Granitic strips in the ocean floor ... Novanet
Paleomagnetic evidence was used to confirm the theory of plate tectonics. By studying the alignment of magnetic minerals in rocks, scientists were able to support the idea that continents have moved over time, providing evidence for the movement of tectonic plates.
a. seismic waves b. volcanoes c. earthquakes d. rocks
It took several decades before new evidence emerged to support Wegener's original theory of continental drift. In the 1960s, significant discoveries such as seafloor spreading and plate tectonics provided strong evidence to confirm Wegener's ideas. This eventually led to the widespread acceptance of the theory of plate tectonics in the scientific community.
Simply put, because there is not enough evidence to support it. "Rejected by scientists" should not be taken to always mean "scientist believe it is impossible" - rather, consistent evidence that support the hypothesis has not been produced.
Scientists indicated that the seafloor was spreading, so the poles "reverse"
The evidence that supports plate tectonics is continental drift and sea floor spreading. Continental drift was discovered by Alfred Wegener in 1915. He discovered a super continent he called Pangaea. Although many people said that the continents looked like they fit together, he was the first to supply evidence. Many people did not believe his theory and ignored it for at least 40 years. Sea floor spreading has discovered by Harry Hess during world war 2. He was a navy ship commander. He was watching for German Submarines when he saw an underwater mountain range, called the Mid Atlantic ridge.
Discard it all.
There was no evidence and still is none. Louis Pasteur along with countless other scientists have disproved the theory of spontaneous generation.