Ostwald T. Avery's experiment was an extension of the works of Griffith's. Griffith's experiment using virulent and avirulent Streptococcus pneumoniae (which had different colony characteristics) proved that it was possible for the heat killed virulent Streptococcus pneumoniae to pass on the genetic information for formation of smooth colonies to avirulent strains. Avery, Mc Leod and Mc Carty conclusively found out that the genetic material responsible for transfer of characteristics between the strains was DNA. This was achieved by incubating the cell lysate of virulent Streptococcus with proteases, RNAses and DNAses separately before mixing it with avirulent strains. It was found that only when the lysate was incubated with DNAses did the transfer of smooth colony formation characteristic from the virulent strain to the avirulent strain fail to occur.
Yes
== == Homologous provide evidence for evolution because it shows the similarities and how we evolved from the same ancestors
Darwin's theory of evolution is supported by a vast amount of evidence from various scientific fields, such as biology, genetics, paleontology, and comparative anatomy. The theory is also consistent with observations of natural selection in action, as well as with the fossil record showing gradual changes over time. Additionally, modern research continues to provide new evidence in support of the theory.
The theory is based on replicable evidence. This evidence turns a theory into a fact.
Yes, a theory should be supported by evidence in order to be considered valid and credible. Evidence helps to substantiate the claims and predictions made by a theory, allowing for testing, verification, and refinement of the theory as needed.
Cell Theory
Averys of Bristol, are fine wine merchants since 1793, sell fine wine to anybody in the world. They provide customers with the finest of their high-quality wine.
Yes
Yes, the theory of evolution by natural selection is an example of a falsifiable theory. This means that it can be tested and potentially proven wrong through empirical evidence.
The "Out of Africa" theory is most supported by modern evidence. This theory posits that modern humans originated in Africa and then migrated to populate the rest of the world, replacing other hominid species like Neanderthals. Genetic studies and fossil evidence provide strong support for this theory.
the earliest humans evolved in the rift valley in africa
A discovery that shows species appearing suddenly in the fossil record without any preceding ancestors would provide evidence against the theory of evolution. This would contradict the gradual changes in species predicted by evolution.
There is no single piece of evidence that definitively disproves evolution. The theory of evolution is supported by a vast amount of evidence from various scientific fields, including genetics, paleontology, and comparative anatomy. Any challenges to the theory of evolution would need to provide substantial evidence and be subject to rigorous scientific scrutiny.
Fossil records, anatomical similarities, embryological development, and genetic similarities are all forms of evidence that support the theory of evolution. These pieces of evidence show the gradual changes in species over time and provide support for the idea that all organisms are related through common ancestry.
In physics, experiments are mostly used to provide proof of a theory. For example, when a theory predicts a particular relation between an object, its placement, and the time it takes to fall to the floor, a series of experiments can be conducted to provide evidence for the theory, or to dismiss it.
The die theory of the Earth is a debunked hypothesis that suggests the Earth is hollow and inhabited by a hidden civilization. This theory is not supported by scientific evidence and is considered pseudoscience. Mainstream geology and seismology provide strong evidence that the Earth is a solid, layered structure with a molten core.
Yes. If you have a theory about how things work, it might turn out to be true or it might turn out to be false. The more you know about the subject, the stronger the theory is likely to be, and the likelier it is that the theory will be proven.