0
What do those scientists who do not believe in the earth is experiencing global warming use as evidence to support their claims?
Scientists who do not believe in global warming often cite natural climate variability as a primary reason for their skepticism, arguing that Earth's climate has undergone significant fluctuations throughout geological history without human influence. They may also point to periods of temperature stabilization or cooling observed in certain datasets, such as satellite measurements. Additionally, they sometimes question the reliability of climate models and emphasize uncertainties in climate predictions, suggesting that current warming trends could be overstated or misinterpreted.
What else can I help you with?
What do scientists believe provides evidence for the bid bang theory?
Scientists believe that several key pieces of evidence support the Big Bang theory, including the observed expansion of the universe, cosmic microwave background radiation, and the abundance of light elements like hydrogen and helium. The redshift of distant galaxies indicates that the universe is expanding, while the cosmic microwave background radiation is thought to be the afterglow of the initial explosion. Additionally, the proportions of light elements align with predictions made by Big Bang nucleosynthesis. Together, these observations provide strong support for the theory.
What do those scienceists who believe the earth is experiencing global warming use as evidence to support their claims?
Scientists who believe the Earth is experiencing global warming cite a range of evidence, including rising global temperatures recorded over the past century, melting polar ice caps and glaciers, and increasing sea levels. They also highlight changes in weather patterns, such as more frequent and intense heatwaves, storms, and droughts. Additionally, the correlation between rising carbon dioxide levels from human activities, such as fossil fuel combustion, and temperature increases supports their claims. These findings are often corroborated by climate models that predict future warming trends based on current emissions scenarios.
What evidence do scientists find in fossils and living things?
Scientists find evidence in fossils and living things such as changes in morphology, genetic similarities, and transitional forms that support the theory of evolution. Fossils can show physical adaptations over time, and living organisms can reflect common ancestry through shared genetic traits. These pieces of evidence help scientists to understand the evolutionary history and relationships between different species.
Do Jewish scientists believe in genesis or the big bang theory?
Almost all Jewish scientists, like almost all Gentile scientists, accept the Big Bang as the correct description of our Universe. The only people who accept Genesis are Biblical literalists, and they do so in spite of scientific evidence. There is no serious evidence whatsoever to support a Universe that has existed for only a few thousand years. That being an irrefutable fact, I seriously doubt there are many Jewish scientists that are Biblical literalists.
Why must you always have evidence to support your statement?
Having evidence to support a statement is important because it adds credibility and strengthens the argument being made. Evidence helps to validate the claim and gives others a reason to believe or trust in the information being provided. Without evidence, statements can be seen as purely opinion-based and lacking in credibility.
Why is a hypothesis that is unsupported by observation rejected by scientists?
Simply put, because there is not enough evidence to support it. "Rejected by scientists" should not be taken to always mean "scientist believe it is impossible" - rather, consistent evidence that support the hypothesis has not been produced.
Which scientists do not believe in ghosts?
Many scientists do not believe in ghosts because there is no scientific evidence to support their existence. Ghosts are generally seen as a phenomenon that falls more into the realm of culture, folklore, and belief systems rather than scientific inquiry. Scientists prioritize evidence-based explanations for the world around us, which typically do not include supernatural entities like ghosts.
What evidence do scientists have to support the relationships of the earths parts?
a. seismic waves b. volcanoes c. earthquakes d. rocks
What do those scientists who believe the earth is experiencing global warming use as evidence to support their claims?
Scientists who believe in global warming use various types of evidence, including temperature data, sea level rise, melting ice caps, and changes in weather patterns. They also rely on computer models that simulate future climate scenarios based on current trends. These pieces of evidence collectively suggest that the Earth's climate is indeed warming due to human activities.
Do scientist believe that bigfoot exsits?
Most scientists do not believe that Bigfoot exists, as there is no conclusive scientific evidence to support its existence. Claims of Bigfoot sightings and evidence have not been successfully validated through scientific investigation.
What do you think scientists would do if they found evidence that did not support the Big Bang theory?
Discard it all.
What evidence support spontaneous generation?
There was no evidence and still is none. Louis Pasteur along with countless other scientists have disproved the theory of spontaneous generation.
How has religion changed over time because of science?
Many religions have been changed overtime by scientific facts either supporting them or proving them wrong. For example, many scientists believe and support the hypothesis of evolution. Proven evidence may change the way someone looks on their own religion. If scientists found the holy grail and all other sorts of artifacts people would believe in Christianity more because of the evidence supporting it.
Why do you not believe in the existence of extraterrestrial life?
There is currently no conclusive evidence to support the existence of extraterrestrial life. Scientists continue to search for signs of life beyond Earth, but until concrete proof is found, many remain skeptical.
What are 2 of the 3 reasons that scientists believe the plates are moving?
Scientists believe that the plates are moving due to the evidence of seafloor spreading at mid-ocean ridges and the distribution of earthquakes along plate boundaries. Additionally, the study of paleomagnetism provides further support for the theory of plate tectonics.
What is the primary source of evidence proposed by scientists to support the theory of an ancient Earth?
The primary source of evidence proposed by scientists to support the theory of an ancient Earth is radiometric dating of rocks and fossils. By measuring the decay of radioactive isotopes within these materials, scientists can estimate their ages and establish a timeline for Earth's history that stretches back billions of years.
What evidence do scientists have to support the idea that the continents were once one large land mass?
Scientists support the idea of a supercontinent called Pangaea through evidence such as matching coastlines, similar rock formations, and identical fossils found on different continents. Additionally, the movement of tectonic plates, as recorded by magnetic anomalies in the ocean floor, provides further support for the theory of continental drift.
