You don't need an experiment to find that out. Elements (gold, water, wind, fire...), unlike compounds, cannot be created or manufactured, they just exist, period. This alone tells you that seashells and snail shells (which are natural proteins) are not elements, as they are created organically.
You can perform a simple chemical analysis by heating the sugar sample to decompose it. If the sugar is a covalent compound, it will break down into its elemental components (carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen). You can then analyze the gases produced and compare them to the expected products of sugar decomposition to confirm the presence of covalent bonds.
When scientists make a mistake, they acknowledge it, review their methods and data, and try to identify the source of the error. They may repeat the experiment to confirm or refute their findings, and may also consult with colleagues to get their perspective on the mistake and how to correct it. Learning from mistakes is an important part of the scientific process.
A single melting point determination may not be enough to accurately identify a solid compound because different compounds can have similar or identical melting points. Additional tests such as infrared spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, or elemental analysis are needed to confirm the identity of a compound.
Replication of a study involves repeating an experiment or research project to confirm the original findings. This helps to validate the reliability and validity of the results. It also allows for identifying any errors or biases in the original study.
The determination of melting point is useful for identifying substances by comparing the observed melting point to known values. It can help confirm the purity of a substance by assessing the sharpness of the melting point curve. Additionally, the melting point can provide information about the stability and potential applications of a compound.
Repeating the experiment will either confirm the results you've just obtained, or show up errors.
If the experiment is not reproducible, no one can perform the experiment independently to confirm the results.
whenever an experiment fails to confirm the theory it is no longer a theory ... it becomes a hypothesis
This indicates that the hypothesis is probably incorrect and a new hypothesis needs to be developed. A negative result for a scientific experiment is just as important as a positive result and means that the experiment was a success.
Albert Einstein's most famous experiment was the photoelectric effect experiment, which helped confirm the particle nature of light and contributed to the development of quantum theory.
repeating a investigation can help to confirm your results. If you try an experiment once, it could be wrong so try it again and repeat it to confirm the results.
whenever an experiment fails to confirm the theory it is no longer a theory ... it becomes a hypothesis
whenever an experiment fails to confirm the theory it is no longer a theory ... it becomes a hypothesis
Do the experiment again and again to confirm the data is correct If the data is consistent then your hypothesis is wrong and you need to think of a new one that fits the data.
There is no public information available to confirm whether Ben Lemoine, the director of The Experiment, has a child. Personal details about his family life are not widely known.
The purpose of the blackbody radiation experiment was to study the spectrum of light emitted by a perfect absorber of radiation at different temperatures. This experiment helped to confirm the existence of quantized energy levels in atoms and provided important insights into the behavior of electromagnetic radiation.
check, affirm, test, verify, certify, show experiment, confirm, declare, authenticate