.
The Question is flawed because it assumes that evolution has strong evidence in favor of the theory. The reality is that there is absolutely no scientific evidence supporting evolution. . Science is now begin to come to terms with this and is in the process of advancing alternate theories.
In the April 2005 issue of Geotimes, John Chaikowsky, in an article titled "Geology vs Physics writes:
"Evolutionists have 'Physics Envy." They tell the public that the science behind evolution is the same science that sent people to the moon, and cures diseases. It's not. The science behind evolution is not empirical, but forensic … no testing, no observations, no repeatability, no falsification … what the public discerns [is] that evolution is just a bunch of just-so stories disguised as legitimate science."
The problem is that most evolutionists have never read The Origin of Species. Darwin himself gave us all the proof we need to show that the theory is wrong.
timetravel has multiple theories about how it could work but none of them have been proven yet.
Proofs exist only in mathematics and logic, not in science. Mathematics and logic are both closed, self-contained systems of propositions, whereas science is empirical and deals with nature as it exists. The primary criterion and standard of evaluation of scientific theory is evidence, not proof. All else equal (such as internal logical consistency and parsimony), scientists prefer theories for which there is more and better evidence to theories for which there is less and worse evidence. Proofs are not the currency of science. Proofs have two features that do not exist in science: They are final, and they are binary. Once a theorem is proven, it will forever be true and there will be nothing in the future that will threaten its status as a proven theorem (unless a flaw is discovered in the proof). Apart from a discovery of an error, a proven theorem will forever and always be a proven theorem.
Unlike religion, science need objective and strong evidence before giving credit to a theory as explanation of something. And anything that has been proven "true" can always be proven wrong by any other new theory which fits better or simoly be proven wrong.
A proven truth is a fact or statement that has been verified through evidence, data, or logical reasoning. It is something that is widely accepted as accurate and reliable based on scientific, historical, or empirical research.
If something is not a fact, it means that it cannot be proven to be true based on evidence or logic. It may be an opinion, belief, or speculation.
Yes, the theory of evolution is falsifiable. This means that it can be tested and potentially proven wrong through scientific evidence.
There is no proven theory of evolution only the physical evidence of what Chuck Norris has allowed to live.
Evolution is widely accepted by the scientific community because it is supported by mountains of evidence from various fields like genetics, paleontology, and biochemistry. It is considered a scientific theory, which means it is a well-substantiated explanation based on evidence. Biblical Creation, on the other hand, is a belief based on religious texts rather than empirical evidence, and therefore is not considered a scientific explanation.
No. Human evolution is a proven fact even if peoples' religious beliefs are contradictory to the facts. These are questions are not scientific questions but ones that are best debated and answered by philosophy.
No. A new study out of Northwestern actually has provided substancial evidence that it does exist. Besides the tens of thousands that self-identify as bisexual. Google it.
Because evolution is a proven, testable, scientific theory.
Yes, the theory of evolution by natural selection is an example of a falsifiable theory. This means that it can be tested and potentially proven wrong through empirical evidence.
The results are any known information that has been proven with some type of evidence. Also it has gone through a judge which has declared it proven evidence and a proven result.
No. Evolution has been excepted as science, but it is not scientifically proven.Second answerOnly mathematical equations can be "proven." Science simply compiles evidence that best supports natural phenomenon. In order for something to be considered scientific, it has to be falsifiable. Some people with ideological biases claim evolution is not scientific since it can't be disproven. There have been numerous times in the past where it could have been, like the discovery of DNA. If all life on earth wasn't related, the DNA would have shown this. However, it showed that humans share genes with everything from the biggest redwood tree to the deadliest virus. Evolution has thus stood up to over 150 years of intense scrutiny. Therefore, it is not proven in a mathematical sense, but it is backed by lots of evidence.
None. Evolution is a myth and can not be proven.
History was proven by leakey corrected in his observation by when he finds the evidence.
This ongoing debate between religion (God created man) and science (theory of evolution) about "creation" has never been resolved as God, himself, can neither be proven nor dis-proven. Also, the theory of evolution has also yet to be proven.