An investigation which is conducted under strictly controlled and monitored conditions is likely to result in mor reliable investigations.
Empirical evidence is evidence that is obtained through observation or experimentation using the five senses. This evidence is based on direct sensory experience and is considered objective and reliable in scientific research and investigation.
You need to do your directed reading mr/miss! I have the exact same one but i dont have 11, 15,21,29,33,and 34! Do you understand me!
One was performed (done)
Yes, it is important to rinse the probes of a conductivity meter when testing more than one solution to prevent cross-contamination. Residual substances from one solution can affect the accuracy of the measurements in subsequent tests. Rinsing the probes with the same solvent or a clean solution helps ensure reliable and consistent results. Additionally, it helps maintain the integrity of the meter and prolongs its lifespan.
A reliable selection process is one that consistently leads to the same outcomes when applied to a group of candidates over time. It should produce consistent results and minimize errors or biases in the selection of candidates for a particular role. This can be achieved through standardized assessments, multiple interview stages, and validated selection criteria.
One possible benefit would be that, maybe, they could share their knowledge. Maybe it could also be to make the investigation more reliable?
where you are checking how reliable soemthing is, whether you repeat it, compare your results with someone else or calculation an average of more than one set of results! -hope this helped
A reliable test is one that has the same results over time. This means you can trust the test and its outcome.
In many or most cases scientists publish their results in sequences of papers, rather than in one big results paper. So, after one of them publishes a set of results they go on to produce more results or to write up or refine other results that they already have. Eventually, they move on to investigating some related aspect of the same question, or to a different question entirely.
A reliable experiment is one that can be proven or has been worked out several times giving valid or dependable results.
a accurate result would be true as possible but a reliable result would be one that is compared
Scientists need be able to collect reliable results that are repeatable. This means that if they are repeated, they should get results that are close to one another. This also allows anomalies/outliers to be found.
To determine if the information being reported is fair and reliable one would have to check the reliability of the sources. This can be done by contacting the sources directly, and/or further investigation.
If one doesn't research before doing an experiment, one won't have any background knowledge on what they are doing. This way, when one gets results, they will have this information to back the results up. Of course, this is assuming that the scientific investigation isn't totally new to humankind so that there wouldn't be any information on the subject one is investigating.
An independent laboratory is thought to give an unbiased result were as the laboratory is full of people so you can know if every one has got similar results.
An independent laboratory is thought to give an unbiased result were as the laboratory is full of people so you can know if every one has got similar results.
An independent laboratory is thought to give an unbiased result were as the laboratory is full of people so you can know if every one has got similar results.