0
What else can I help you with?
Why is the lack of direct evidence on black holes a problem for scientists?
I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.
Why is the lack of direct evidence for black holes a problem for scientist?
The lack of direct evidence for black holes poses a challenge for scientists because black holes, by their nature, do not emit any light or radiation that can be easily detected. Instead, researchers must rely on indirect observations and theoretical models to infer the presence of black holes. This makes it difficult to conclusively prove their existence through direct observation.
What are some things that have holes in them?
Some things that have holes in them are donuts, cheese graters, strainers, and colanders.
Is a white hole just as dangerous as a black hole?
White holes are theoretical objects that are the opposite of black holes, expelling matter instead of absorbing it. They are not considered to be dangerous like black holes, as they do not have the same gravitational pull or ability to trap objects with their intense gravitational force. White holes are not thought to exist in our universe.
Do white holes suck up objects like black holes do?
White holes are theoretical regions of spacetime that expel matter and energy outward, the opposite of black holes which pull matter in. They do not suck up objects like black holes do. However, there is no observational evidence for the existence of white holes in the universe.
Why is the lack of direct evidence on black holes a problem for scientists?
I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.
Why is the lack of direct evidence for black holes a problem for scientists?
There is enough evidence for black holes - I don't see any problem there.
What does it mean that black holes are theory?
Whoever said this seems to think that there is not enough direct evidence for black holes. However, I understand there is enough evidence to believe that black holes actually exist - including the observation of many, many objects that can only be black holes.
Will black holes exist?
There is a lot of evidence that they do, indeed, exist.
Do scientists have x-ray evidence that black holes exist?
Yes.
How do astronomers use evidence to detect black holes?
Astronomers use evidence such as the behavior of nearby stars and gas, as well as the bending of light around invisible objects, to detect the presence of black holes in space.
Do black holes orbit the universe?
Most likely not. The best evidence of the existence of black holes has been found deep within galaxies.
Why is the lack of direct evidence for black holes a problem for scientist?
The lack of direct evidence for black holes poses a challenge for scientists because black holes, by their nature, do not emit any light or radiation that can be easily detected. Instead, researchers must rely on indirect observations and theoretical models to infer the presence of black holes. This makes it difficult to conclusively prove their existence through direct observation.
Who proves guilt in a case?
The prosecution will show the evidence and present the testimony that indicates guilt. The defending attorney will try to punch holes in the evidence and testimony. The jury then decides what the facts are based on the testimony and evidence.
What evidence has been found to support the theory that Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 may have had bullet holes in its fuselage?
There is no credible evidence to support the theory that Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 had bullet holes in its fuselage. The official investigation has not found any proof of this claim.
How are white holes made and what is their role in the universe?
White holes are theoretical objects that are the opposite of black holes. They are believed to be created as a result of the mathematical equations that describe black holes, but there is no observational evidence of their existence. In theory, white holes would expel matter and energy outward, in contrast to black holes which pull matter and energy inward. Their role in the universe, if they exist, is not well understood, but some scientists speculate that they could potentially be connected to the creation of new universes or play a role in the recycling of matter and energy.
What are some things that have holes in them?
Some things that have holes in them are donuts, cheese graters, strainers, and colanders.
