basically someone who is FOR large companies/ countries making excessive profits by finding the cheapest labour (asian/african countries in particular), materials and selling a product for a profit. this is a very capitalist idea and companies include Ford, McDonalds, MATTEL etc p.s. read a book if you really want to enhance your understanding a more likely grades...
no, because the argument is all rolled together
A strong argument is one that is logically sound, supported by evidence and reasoning, and addresses counterarguments effectively. A weak argument lacks evidence, has logical fallacies, and relies on emotional appeals rather than facts.
The choice between the design argument and the cosmological argument often depends on one's philosophical perspective. The design argument emphasizes the complexity and order in the universe as evidence of an intelligent creator, appealing to intuition about purpose and intention. In contrast, the cosmological argument focuses on the necessity of a first cause to explain the existence of the universe, which can resonate with those who prioritize causality and metaphysics. Ultimately, the "better" argument may vary based on individual beliefs and the context in which they are discussed.
The cosmological argument is a type of argument for the existence of God based on the idea that the universe must have a cause that originated it. It asserts that everything that begins to exist must have a cause, and since the universe began to exist, it must also have a cause. This argument has been debated for centuries by philosophers and theologians.
No, it is not important to dominate an argument. Healthy discussions involve listening, understanding different perspectives, and finding common ground. Dominating an argument often prevents constructive conversation and can lead to a breakdown in communication.
A counter argument is an argument made against another argument.
Passing an argument by value means that the method that receives the argument can not change the value of the argument. Passing an argument by reference means that the method that receives the argument can change the value of the incoming argument, and the argument may be changed in the orignal calling method.
Argument Deductive argument Inductive Argument Analogy
argument
An argument is inductive when it is based on probability, such as statistics. In an inductive argument, if the premises are true, the conclusion is probably true.
No, an argument cannot be void. An argument can be weak, flawed, or unconvincing, but it still retains its basic structure and content. A void argument would imply that there is no argument at all.
Evidence to support the argument is needed for a sound argument.
An argument from design is a theological term for a teleological argument - an argument for the existence of God, such that because nature is orderly, it is evidence of a designer.
The claim is the argument you plan to prove.
To have an argument called Debate
A central argument is a dominant and controlling argument.
The correct spelling of the word is argument.Some example sentences with this word are:There is an argument next door.The political argument wore on for hours.His argument brought up some valid points.