Pulsars(short for PULSAting Radio Stars) are highly magnetized rotating neutron stars that emit a beam of electromagnetic radiation in the form of radio waves. Their observed rotational periods range from 1.4 ms to 8.5 seconds The radiation can only be observed when the beam is pointing towards the Earth. This is called the "lighthouse effect" and gives rise to the pulsed nature that gives pulsars their name. Because neutron stars are very dense objects, the rotation period and thus the interval between observed pulses are very regular. For some pulsars, the regularity of pulsation is as precise as an atomic clock. Pulsars are known to have planets orbiting them, as in the case of PSR B1257+12.
A quasar (contraction of QUASi-stellAR radio source) is an extremely powerful and distant active galactic nucleus. They were first identified as being high redshift sources of electromagnetic energy, including radio waves and visible light that were point-like, similar to stars, rather than extended sources similar to galaxies. While there was initially some controversy over the nature of these objects, there is now a scientific consensus that a quasar is a compact region 10-10000 Schwarzschild radii across surrounding the central supermassive black hole of a galaxy. It is a very large object at the centre of a very distant, and hence very old, galaxy. It has a mass of thousands or even millions of times that of our sun. As matter is dragged into it, it emits huge amounts of radio waves, but because it is so far away it appears to us as a point source - hence quasi stellar.
Twin Quasar was created in 1979.
No, the biggest quasar is not capable of destroying the biggest supermassive black hole. Quasars are powered by the accretion of material onto supermassive black holes, so they are closely related. The interaction between a quasar and its host black hole is complex but does not result in the destruction of the black hole.
No, a quasar is a distant celestial object that emits intense amounts of energy. While a quasar can release powerful radiation and energy into space, it cannot directly obliterate an entire planet in the way a weapon might. The impact of a quasar on a planet would depend on factors such as distance and the planet's atmosphere.
Yes. A pulsar is a rapidly spinning neutron star.
No. Life cannot exist anywhere near a quasar. For one thing there is no "on" a quasar. A quasar consists of a disk of extremely hot matter falling into a supermassive black hole. What cannot cross the event horizon is ejected in jets at the poles at nearly the speed of light. The radiation of even a moderate quasar is more than 10 trillion times that of the sun. Even light years away any planet would be completely sterilized.
No, not in the slightest sense. A quasar, pulsar, and galaxy are three very different things.
That would be called a "pulsar". See related question
Pulsar Quasar Radial(?) These are all names for some variety of "star"
They are separate phenomenon and different principals are in action.
Radio waves are not conducted. They propagate. They do not need a medium through which to propagate. They just move.
Depends on how you look at "power" I suppose, but a quasar is similar to a pulsar in that it has high enough angular velocity to produce jets of EM and synchrotron radiation through it's poles but however, a quasar is orders of magnitude larger than a pulsar since a pulsar is just a single neutron star (Maybe 20-30km in diameter) while the quasar is a entire galactic nuclei.
Magnitude - sheer size.A quark is tiny - it takes 3 to make a single proton.A quasar is a "quasi star" and is actually an entire galaxy with its core on fire(not actual fire with flames, but in the act of constantly blowing up).
A galaxy is a massive collection of stars, most orbiting around a supermassive black hole.A pulsar is a rapidly rotating neutron star that emits a beam of electronic radiation.See related questions.
If they are both young - nothing. The only difference between the two is that a pulsar has one of it's poles pointing towards Earth - so we can detect the "pulse". See related questions.
First of all, the main distinguishing factor between Pulsar 150 and Pulsar 135 is the cost. Pulsar 150, as the name says, 150cc has more power, pick up and speed when compared to Pulsar 135. But, pulsar 135 has also got the equivalent features of Pulsar 150. (Because of the latest technology) In a nutshell, Pulsar 135 is a lite version of Pulsar 150. And, my opinion, Pulsar 150 is better...
It is not.
a large redshift in the spectrum of the quasar.