Yea gotta eat the butt
The process that must occur is peer review, where other experts in the field evaluate the experimental design, methods, results, and conclusions of the study to ensure its validity and potential biases are addressed. Additionally, transparency in reporting all methods and results is essential for other researchers to replicate the study and verify the findings independently.
In theory, scientists describe how they obtained their results (a) so that other researchers can verify the validity of the research, and (b ) so that new research can be built on what has been done before.
replicable, meaning that they can be reproduced by others following the same procedure. The results should also be objective and unbiased, allowing for accurate interpretation and analysis. Additionally, the experiment should be conducted with proper controls and variables to ensure validity.
Scientists typically communicate the results of an experiment through scientific journals, presentations at conferences, or by publishing their findings in peer-reviewed research papers. This allows other scientists to review, replicate, and build upon the work.
A fair experiment is fair wheras an accurate experiment is more accurate. LOL Joke. The latter simply means the results are to a higher degree of.... accuracy e.g instead of to 5, the result could be 5.1235 However a fair experiment is a test carried out under fair conditions. If testing more than once during the experiment you have to be sure that things remain at the same level i.e. Temperatures Amounts of reactants Time must remain the same..
Retesting an experiment can help verify the results and ensure they are consistent and reliable. It also allows for any errors or inconsistencies to be identified and corrected. By repeating the experiment, you can increase the validity and confidence in the findings.
The run the experiments over and over again, looking for anything that may have gone wrong to give them that outcome. They also test variables to see how changing them affects the outcome. Also, research teams that are independent from the original team usually try to verify the outcome to verify the integrity of the experiment.
The results of an experiment must be reproducible, meaning that they can be consistently obtained when the experiment is repeated by other researchers. Results should also be accurate, reflecting the true outcome of the experiment, and relevant to the research question being investigated. Additionally, results should be clearly presented and interpreted in the context of existing scientific knowledge.
If the experiment is not reproducible, no one can perform the experiment independently to confirm the results.
A control experiment provides a benchmark against which to compare the results of the main experiment. For example, to know if heating a material changes its resistance, you must be able to compare the results of the heated experiment to a copy in which the material was left unheated.
Intelligent investigators.
A valid experiment is the one which is done on the basis of some facts and figures. The experiment which has a good statistical analysis is known to be valid experiment.step 3.
A control group is must for every new experiment or uncommon experiment. Because when an experiment is being done anything unexpected could happen and to control the hazard a control group should be ready everytime. Otherwise it can be very dangerous for the experiment holders. to help you conclude that no uncontrolled factors significantly influenced your results
A scientific experiment must be done by something that can show change. All of these can be variables.
The experiment must be redone and checked for potential errors; does the conclusion of the experiment continuously disprove the hypothesis, the latter must be changed to fit.
The dissertation (research) must be defended successfully. The results of the research and experimentation do not have to be successful. The hypothesis must be determined and an experiment done to prove, or disprove, the hypothesis. If the results are inconclusive, the defense will involve showing what variables might have led to it being inconclusive. It must be definitive enough that a future researcher can build on the results, rather than having to start from scratch.
The first must be inaccurate because you are sure the second results are correct.