When a scientist rejects a hypothesis, it means that the data or evidence does not support the initial proposed explanation for a phenomenon. This rejection prompts the scientist to reconsider the hypothesis, gather more data, or formulate a new hypothesis that better fits the observed results.
Discard or change the hypothesis
A hypothesis doesn't necessarily need to be correct. After a scientist has conducted an experiment and discovered that their hypothesis is incorrect, they still have gained the knowledge and the results from their experiment---as well as the correct answer, in some cases. They can use the results from the experiment that tested the original hypothesis to form a new experiment.
continental drift
If a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis, it means that the evidence gathered from their experiments or observations was not strong enough to disprove the hypothesis. This does not confirm the hypothesis as true; instead, it suggests that there is insufficient evidence to support an alternative explanation. It is important to note that failing to reject a hypothesis does not provide proof of its validity, and further research may be needed to draw more definitive conclusions.
T
They come up with a conclusion to the hypothesis
conclusion
If their data supported their hypothesis, then they would make a conclusion.
Drawing a conclusion apex
I no
Drawing Conclusions
making observations
the scientist called biologist make som conclusion after a hypothesis and theory then they work on it
.Form a hypothesis do a experiment think about the results Form a conclusion
The results of a science experiment do not have to match the original hypothesis. Indeed, the results collected in an experiment may be completely different to those that the scientist predicted.
observe, make a hypothesis, experiment, conclusion, peer review, repeat