0
If a hypothesis and conclusion do not match, scientists will typically revisit their experimental design and data to identify any errors or inconsistencies. They may also conduct additional experiments to gather more data or explore alternative explanations. This process of reevaluation and experimentation is crucial for refining theories and advancing scientific knowledge. Ultimately, if the hypothesis is consistently unsupported, scientists may discard or modify it based on the evidence.
What else can I help you with?
What does it mean when a scientist rejects a hypothesis?
When a scientist rejects a hypothesis, it means that the data or evidence does not support the initial proposed explanation for a phenomenon. This rejection prompts the scientist to reconsider the hypothesis, gather more data, or formulate a new hypothesis that better fits the observed results.
What would a scientist next steps be if his or her data failed to support his or her hypothesis?
Discard or change the hypothesis
When a scientist finds that a hypothesis is wrong the scientist usually?
A hypothesis doesn't necessarily need to be correct. After a scientist has conducted an experiment and discovered that their hypothesis is incorrect, they still have gained the knowledge and the results from their experiment---as well as the correct answer, in some cases. They can use the results from the experiment that tested the original hypothesis to form a new experiment.
German scientist Alfred Wegener is best known for what hypothesis?
continental drift
What doesit means if a scientist fails reject a hypothesis?
If a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis, it means that the evidence gathered from their experiments or observations was not strong enough to disprove the hypothesis. This does not confirm the hypothesis as true; instead, it suggests that there is insufficient evidence to support an alternative explanation. It is important to note that failing to reject a hypothesis does not provide proof of its validity, and further research may be needed to draw more definitive conclusions.
What do you do when your conclusion don't match your hypothesis?
T
What does a scientist need to do once an experiment is complete what must a scientist do to determine whether the data support the hypothesis?
They come up with a conclusion to the hypothesis
In any good experiment the scientist needs to blank the hypothesis?
conclusion
What would a scientist next steps be if his or her data supported his or her hypothesis?
If their data supported their hypothesis, then they would make a conclusion.
What is it call when scientist states whether data confirmed or rejected the hypothesis?
Drawing a conclusion apex
When drawing a conclusion-scientist examine the data to see if it supports or fails to support the hypothesis?
I no
When drawing a conclusion scientist examine the data to see if it supports or fails to support the hypothesis?
Drawing Conclusions
When a scientist rejects a hypothesis which part of the scientific process is he or she performing?
making observations
How Biology Do Their work?
the scientist called biologist make som conclusion after a hypothesis and theory then they work on it
Three skills that a scientist need?
.Form a hypothesis do a experiment think about the results Form a conclusion
Do your results have to match your hypothesis in an experiment?
The results of a science experiment do not have to match the original hypothesis. Indeed, the results collected in an experiment may be completely different to those that the scientist predicted.
What is a scientific method scientist use?
observe, make a hypothesis, experiment, conclusion, peer review, repeat
