Any ideas that suggest non-living things can form from cells, disprove the presence of cells in living organisms, or reject the basic unit of life being the cell would not support the cell theory. Additionally, beliefs that cells are not fundamental to the functions and structures of living organisms would also not align with the cell theory.
We are already on a planet with a magnetic field and yes magnetic fields are what protect the planet from various dangers. Not to mention nearly every planet we have seen has a magnetic field (save venus). It is believed that the magnetic fields of planets save them from solar winds which would otherwise slowly strip the atmospheres of planets by taking out chunks of atoms every time they hit. Mars has an extremely weak (or none according to many scientists) magnetic field and as such the solar winds bash into it and scoop out ions from the planet. Overall conclusion: Yes, you want to visit a planet with a strong magnetic field, it's basically more protection (in theory at least).
Mercury and salt are not inherently magnetic, so they will not be affected by a magnetic force in the same way that magnetic materials like iron or nickel would be. Therefore, a magnetic force would not repel mercury and salt.
No, naphthalene is not magnetic because it does not contain any unpaired electrons or magnetic properties that would make it attract to a magnetic field.
You might, but that would be wrong! Mercury has a strong magnetic field.
the devine right theory
fossils
A 17th century European king would most likely support the divine right theory.
The divine right theory
the devine right theory
The divine right theory
The divine right theory
the two theories that attempt to explain earths magnetic field are Dynamo theory--the theory that is believed by the majority of geologists. it says the rotation of the earth causes the liquid core to move in one overall direction, causing the movement of electrical charges, creating the current making the magnetic field. Rapid-decay theory---is believed by the minority of geologists. it makes assumptions about how the earth was formed to calculate how much electrical current would be generated and how much it would have slowed down. =
A 17th century European king would most likely support the divine right theory.
the political theory of states right
Both contain DNA
Discard it all.