answersLogoWhite

0

The control of an exothermic reaction is more difficult and accidents are possible.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Natural Sciences

Is Nuclear fusion accident prone?

Nuclear fusion is considered to be inherently safer than nuclear fission because it does not involve chain reactions and cannot lead to meltdowns or explosions. However, there are still risks associated with equipment malfunctions, radioactivity, and other operational issues that need to be carefully managed to ensure safety. Overall, while fusion is not accident-prone in the same way as fission, it still requires close attention to safety protocols.


What is safer high tide or low tide?

Low tide is generally considered safer than high tide, especially in coastal areas. At low tide, more land is exposed, reducing the risk of strong wave action and potential flooding. Additionally, it allows for safer access to tidal zones and marine activities. However, local conditions and specific geographical features can also influence safety, so it's always important to be aware of the environment and conditions.


Will Mars be safer then Earth?

no mars is not saver then earth


Are you safer in the middle of the ocean or on the shore during a tsunami?

You are safer in the middle of the ocean, where a tsunamis is barely even noticeable. It only becomes dangerous when it enters shallow water.


Why are reactions that emit alpha particles generally considered more safe than those that emit beta particles?

Alpha particles are actually electron-less helium nuclei versus beta particles which are actually electrons, which are much smaller than alpha particles. Therefore, alpha particles' penetrating strength is much smaller than beta particles (a sheet of paper versus a wooden board). Therefore, beta particles will penetrate more into a human body and will do more damage than alpha particles which are usually stopped at the skin.

Related Questions

Is army or navy safer?

In this day and age? The Navy would have to be considered somewhat safer, based on the recent historical record.


What is safer navy or army?

In this day and age? The Navy would have to be considered somewhat safer, based on the recent historical record.


Are sharp knives or dull knives safer?

Sharp knives are less likely to slip off of the material being cut, and so are considered safer.


Is it a true statement that a body to frame is still considered a safer car when involved in a collision?

It may be "considered" safer, but there is no absolute reason why it would be. There are certainly many unibody vehicles that perform better in crash tests than others that are built body-on-frame.


Why is PayPal considered a safer payment option compared to other methods?

PayPal is considered a safer payment option because it offers buyer protection, encryption technology to safeguard personal information, and a secure payment platform that reduces the risk of fraud and unauthorized transactions.


Is corn oil safer than butter?

Since corn oil is unsaturated it is considered healthier than butter.


Are walk in bathtubs safer than normal tubs?

Yes, walk in tubs are considered safer as long as it is made of some sort of non slip material. Most accidents involving bathtubs occure in normal tubs.


Is a black electric fireplace safer than an ordinary fireplace?

A black electric fireplace can be considered safer than an ordinary fireplace because an electric fireplace sends off no sparks. It also emits no fumes or smoke.


Is contactless payment safer than chip technology?

Contactless payment and chip technology are both secure methods of payment, but contactless payment is generally considered safer because it reduces the risk of card skimming and fraud.


Which is safer: a cashier's check or a money order?

A cashier's check is generally considered safer than a money order because it is issued by a bank and is backed by the bank's funds, providing more security against fraud or loss.


Why are natural chemicals considered safer than industrial?

Because people are morons. Chemicals are chemicals, and the source is chemically irrelevant.


Is fusion power plant safe?

ITER is considered safe. It is easy to stop a fusion reaction, and difficult (so far) to sustain it. The byproduct (helium) is essentially harmless, and can be freely vented into the atmosphere in the event of a catastrophe with little risk to humans, plants, or animals. Concentrations of the gas in an enclosed area could lead to asphyxiation, but the gas itself is light and would readily escape into the atmosphere.