The control of an exothermic reaction is more difficult and accidents are possible.
Nuclear fusion is considered to be inherently safer than nuclear fission because it does not involve chain reactions and cannot lead to meltdowns or explosions. However, there are still risks associated with equipment malfunctions, radioactivity, and other operational issues that need to be carefully managed to ensure safety. Overall, while fusion is not accident-prone in the same way as fission, it still requires close attention to safety protocols.
Low tide is generally considered safer than high tide, especially in coastal areas. At low tide, more land is exposed, reducing the risk of strong wave action and potential flooding. Additionally, it allows for safer access to tidal zones and marine activities. However, local conditions and specific geographical features can also influence safety, so it's always important to be aware of the environment and conditions.
no mars is not saver then earth
You are safer in the middle of the ocean, where a tsunamis is barely even noticeable. It only becomes dangerous when it enters shallow water.
Alpha particles are actually electron-less helium nuclei versus beta particles which are actually electrons, which are much smaller than alpha particles. Therefore, alpha particles' penetrating strength is much smaller than beta particles (a sheet of paper versus a wooden board). Therefore, beta particles will penetrate more into a human body and will do more damage than alpha particles which are usually stopped at the skin.
In this day and age? The Navy would have to be considered somewhat safer, based on the recent historical record.
In this day and age? The Navy would have to be considered somewhat safer, based on the recent historical record.
Sharp knives are less likely to slip off of the material being cut, and so are considered safer.
It may be "considered" safer, but there is no absolute reason why it would be. There are certainly many unibody vehicles that perform better in crash tests than others that are built body-on-frame.
PayPal is considered a safer payment option because it offers buyer protection, encryption technology to safeguard personal information, and a secure payment platform that reduces the risk of fraud and unauthorized transactions.
Since corn oil is unsaturated it is considered healthier than butter.
Yes, walk in tubs are considered safer as long as it is made of some sort of non slip material. Most accidents involving bathtubs occure in normal tubs.
A black electric fireplace can be considered safer than an ordinary fireplace because an electric fireplace sends off no sparks. It also emits no fumes or smoke.
Contactless payment and chip technology are both secure methods of payment, but contactless payment is generally considered safer because it reduces the risk of card skimming and fraud.
A cashier's check is generally considered safer than a money order because it is issued by a bank and is backed by the bank's funds, providing more security against fraud or loss.
Because people are morons. Chemicals are chemicals, and the source is chemically irrelevant.
ITER is considered safe. It is easy to stop a fusion reaction, and difficult (so far) to sustain it. The byproduct (helium) is essentially harmless, and can be freely vented into the atmosphere in the event of a catastrophe with little risk to humans, plants, or animals. Concentrations of the gas in an enclosed area could lead to asphyxiation, but the gas itself is light and would readily escape into the atmosphere.