Eukaryotes are believed to have evolved from a symbiotic relationship between an ancient archaebacterium and a eubacterium. This theory is supported by similarities in their genetic sequences, membrane structure, and other cellular processes. As a result, eukaryotes share more genetic and structural similarities with archaebacteria than eubacteria.
Well, if you're talking about animal kingdoms, it'd be eubacteria and archaebacteria. They're both bacteria. I was just learning about this in science class yesterday! :D
Arche bacteria are much closer to eukaryotes.Bacteria also have some similarities. NO. Archaea, Bacteria and Eukaryota. Bacteria are more closely related to the more complex organisms (Eukaryotes). Archaea are now considered in their own domain. The Archaea in plankton are the most abundant organism on the planet.
Archaea differ from bacteria in their genetic makeup, cell membrane composition, and metabolic pathways. Archaea have a different cell wall structure, lack peptidoglycan, and have unique DNA replication and transcription systems. They are often found in extreme environments and are more closely related to eukaryotes than to bacteria.
Yes. Some are very closely related to archaebacteria which have a large circular chromosome like eubacteria. Others are very closely related to plants (algae), animals (protozoans), and fungi (slime molds) and would have numerous chromosomes, sometimes homologous pairs if diploid, sometimes haploid/monoploid.
are salamanders or snails closely related to an octupus
Archaebacteria and Eubacteria
The kingdoms Eubacteria and Archaebacteria (aka domains Bacteria and Archaea) contain prokaryotic organisms, or organisms without a true nucleus. The kingdom Monera was used to include all the organisms of both kingdoms but was split once taxonomists realized that archaebacteria are more closely related to eukaryotes than eubacteria.
They use to belong to the same kingdom: Moneran, but scientists thought that they were important enough to belong in their own kingdom, especially since archaebacteria is the oldest microorganism. So the answer is No, they belong in different kingdoms. (:
Rod-shaped bacteria (Bacilli)lactobacilliusSphere-shaped bacteria (Cocci) (diplococci), (streptococci) (staphylococci.)Spiral-shaped or cockscrew bacteria (Spirilla) treponema pallidaGram shaped-lactobacillus acidophilus, Esherichia coliFilamentousRound shaped-streptococcus thermophilus
Scientists think that archaea may be the group of prokaryotes that are most closely related to the ancestors of eukaryotes. This is based on genetic and biochemical similarities between archaea and eukaryotes, as well as the shared presence of certain cellular structures and processes.
Well, if you're talking about animal kingdoms, it'd be eubacteria and archaebacteria. They're both bacteria. I was just learning about this in science class yesterday! :D
i believe the answer is Cyanobacteria, because they are photosynthetic, contain chlorophyll as eukaryotic plantae do. Also most algae is eukaryotic with the exception of Cyanobacteria which is a prokaryote. Also it is theorized that plant cells used endosymbiosis to engulf cyanobacteria as a means of producing energy via photosynthesis. ( Cyanobacteria have their own DNA)
Archaebacteria are ancient prokaryotic organisms that can survive in extreme environments, while cyanobacteria are photosynthetic prokaryotes that produce oxygen as a byproduct of photosynthesis. Archaebacteria are more closely related to eukaryotes, while cyanobacteria are responsible for the oxygenation of Earth's early atmosphere.
Archaea are more closely related to eukaryotes than bacteria because they share similar genetic and molecular characteristics, such as the presence of introns in their genes and similar RNA polymerases. This suggests a closer evolutionary relationship between archaea and eukaryotes compared to bacteria.
Arche bacteria are much closer to eukaryotes.Bacteria also have some similarities. NO. Archaea, Bacteria and Eukaryota. Bacteria are more closely related to the more complex organisms (Eukaryotes). Archaea are now considered in their own domain. The Archaea in plankton are the most abundant organism on the planet.
In the years around 1980, there was an emphasis on phylogeny and redefining the kingdoms to be monophyletic groups, groups made up of relatively closely related organisms. The Animalia, Plantae, and Fungi were generally reduced to core groups of closely related forms, and the others placed into the Protista. Based on RNA studies, Carl Woese divided the prokaryotes (Kingdom Monera) into two kingdoms, called Eubacteria and Archaebacteria. Carl Woese attempted to establish a Three Primary Kingdom (or Urkingdom) system in which Plants, Animals, Protista, and Fungi were lumped into one primary kingdom of all eukaryotes. The Eubacteria and Archaebacteria made up the other two urkingdoms. The initial use of "six Kingdom systems" represents a blending of the classic Five Kingdom system and Woese's Three Kingdom system. Such six Kingdom systems have become standard in many works. (Wikipedia) For the source and more detailed information concerning your request, click on the related links section (Wikipedia) indicated directly below this answer section.
Archaea differ from bacteria in their genetic makeup, cell membrane composition, and metabolic pathways. Archaea have a different cell wall structure, lack peptidoglycan, and have unique DNA replication and transcription systems. They are often found in extreme environments and are more closely related to eukaryotes than to bacteria.