0
Many species have vestigial structures, especially in the animal kingdom. Two good examples are the vestigial legs in whales and some snakes. This is clear evidence that whales and snakes are descended from creatures that had functional legs. This is strong evidence of evolution, since there is no other plausible explanation, religious or scientific, for vestigial structures.
What else can I help you with?
Why is evolution misleading?
Evolution is not inherently misleading; it is a fundamental concept in biology supported by extensive evidence. Misunderstandings or misconceptions about evolution may arise from incomplete or incorrect information, personal beliefs, or deliberate misinformation. It is important to rely on scientific evidence and critical thinking to understand the complexities of evolution accurately.
How is fossil evidence of evolution dissproved?
Fossil evidence of evolution is not typically disproved, as fossils are considered crucial pieces of evidence in supporting the theory of evolution. However, the interpretation of fossil evidence can sometimes be open to debate or revision based on new discoveries or scientific understanding. Overall, the accumulation of diverse fossil evidence provides strong support for the concept of evolution and the relatedness of different species.
What was Darwin's evidence for evolution?
Monkeys
What is critical empirical method?
Critical empirical method is an approach to research that involves questioning existing assumptions and power structures, and examining social issues through a critical lens. It combines empirical evidence with critical analysis to understand the complexities of social phenomena and challenge dominant narratives or ideologies. This method emphasizes reflexivity, collaboration, and social transformation.
Is the fossil record valid evidence for evolution?
Yes, the fossil record is considered a valid and significant piece of evidence for evolution. Fossils provide a record of past life forms and show a progression of species over time, supporting the idea that organisms have changed and diversified through evolutionary processes. Additionally, the discovery of transitional fossils helps to fill in gaps and provide connections between different groups of organisms.
Why are vestigal sturctures considered critical evidence of evolution?
Vestigial structures are considered critical evidence of evolution because they are remnants of organs or structures that have lost their original function through the process of evolution. These structures provide insights into an organism's evolutionary history and support the idea that species have changed over time. The presence of vestigial structures suggests that organisms have inherited traits from their ancestors, even if those traits are no longer useful.
Why are vestigial structures considered critical evidence of evolution?
Vestigial structures are considered evidence, but no more critical than any other line of evidence in Biology and palaeontology. They're considered evidence, not because of their function, but because of the way their morphologies follow the nested hierarchies of biology: the vestigial legs of whales, for instance, have exactly the kind of shape we would have expected them to have if whales had descended from land mammals. The same goes for human tailbones and embryonic branchial ridges, the wings of emus, and so on.
Some snakes have vestigial legs Why is this considered evidence for evolution?
This is considered evidence for evolution because vestigial structures like legs in snakes suggest that they have evolved from ancestors that had functional legs. These structures are no longer needed for survival, but their presence supports the idea of common ancestry and evolutionary change over time.
Why is biochemical evidence of evolution considered to be ibdirect?
Biochemical evidence of evolution is considered indirect because it does not provide direct observation of evolutionary changes happening over time. Instead, it relies on comparing similarities and differences in biochemistry, such as DNA sequences or protein structures, to infer evolutionary relationships among organisms.
Why is biochemical evidence of evolution considered to be indirect?
Biochemical evidence of evolution is considered indirect because it does not provide direct evidence of specific evolutionary events or transitions in the fossil record. Instead, it demonstrates similarities in molecular structures or sequences across different species, which support the idea of a common ancestor but do not directly show the process of evolution occurring.
How do homologous structures among animals provide evidence for evolution?
Homologous structures among animals are similar body parts that suggest a common ancestry. These structures provide evidence for evolution because they indicate that different species share a common evolutionary history and have evolved from a common ancestor.
What is the study that can provide evidence of evolution?
The study of comparative anatomy and embryology can provide evidence of evolution by showing similarities in structures across different species, suggesting a common ancestry. Fossil records and molecular genetics can also provide evidence by tracing the evolution of species over time and showing genetic relatedness between different organisms.
What is an explanation of why bird wings and reptile forelegs are evidence of evolution?
Homologous structures indicate a common ancestor
What biological molecules that are considered evidence for evolution include?
Biological molecules are considered evidence for evolution include a. DNA b. amino acids c. porteins d. all of the above Answer: D. All of the above
How do vestigial structures provide evidence for evolution?
Which model of evolution shows change over a relatively short period of time
Biological molecules that are considered evidence for evolution include?
Go to google and not to answer.com
How do you know evolution is a fact?
Technically speaking, evolution isn't a fact; a fact is an "observable and verifiable observation", in contrast to a theory or hypothesis which explains a group of such facts. In contrast, evolution happening can be considered a fact by this defintionAlso, as defined in common usage it can be considered a fact, based on the support and evidence it has:Fossil evidence supports it.DNA evidence supports it.The comparison of similar species and structures ("analogous structures")("comparative anatomy") shows it is possible.Comparison of geographical distribution shows it is possible.Comparison of similar biochemistry and physiology supports it.Applied studies of "complex iteration" (mathematical models of how natural selection and random development occur) show it is possible, and support it.Evidence of observed speciation supports it.
