0
First, it is unscientific to accept any theory as fact. A fundamental rule of the scientific method is fallibilism, which recognizes that all knowledge we have is only the closest approximation to the truth that we've found up to now.
A great example of the need for this is uniformitarianism. What the scientists can reasonably say is that what they SEE of hydrogen throughout the universe APPEARS to be the same. Or whatever other metric they attempt to test. But they cannot rule out physics changing in ways that would not be observable in this fashion.
When a supposed scientist claims that one must accept theory X as fact in order for science to be useful, he is committing multiple fallacies.
The most important is that feeling the need for something doesn't make it so. If physics has changed, then it has changed, and the inconvenience of this for scientists is their own problem. Refusing to consider this simply cripples scientific endeavor that much more.
What else can I help you with?
Who was the scientist who discovered the planetesimal theory?
Viktor Safronov
Who is a famous scientist involed with plate tectonics?
Alfred Wegener is a famous scientist involved with the theory of plate tectonics. He proposed the theory of continental drift in the early 20th century, which eventually led to the development of the modern theory of plate tectonics.
What scientist was inspired by an apple falling of a tree?
Isaac Newton who developed the theory of gravity.
What nineteenth century scientist designed the atomic theory of matter?
John Dalton, an English scientist, developed the atomic theory of matter in the early 19th century. His theory proposed that all matter is made up of tiny, indivisible particles called atoms, each with its own unique properties. Dalton's work laid the foundation for modern atomic theory and greatly influenced the field of chemistry.
Which scientist was responsible fro disproving the theory of spontaneous generation?
Louis Pasteur
Why did other scientists not accept Alfred Wegeners theory?
why did other scientist not accpet Alfred Wegeners theory
Do you think it's wise for scientists not to accept a theory immediately even if the theory has a lot of evidence to support it?
Each scientists have there own opinion. Some accept theories and some have to have facts.
4 Imagine that you are a scientist living at the time that Wagner proposed his theory What might you have thought of his theory What biases might you have had that would influence your acceptance of t?
Just accept his theory.
Why do scientist accept the capture theory?
They generally don't. The Giant Impact Hypothesis is generally accepted amongst scientists.
What do a scientist and a non scientist mean by theory?
ideas
What theory did scientist Rutherford create?
The Atomic Theory
What theory did this scientist provide evidence for?
Cell Theory
How do experiments help scientist learn about the world?
experiments test the scientist theory
What scientist do that is the for their investigation?
theory
Why might a scientists theory might not be believed even if it correct?
A scientist's theory might not be believed even it is correct, if the theory is such a radical departure from existing beliefs that it seems bizarre. The theory of continental drift (which, of course, was eventually accepted) was resisted for decades because it just seemed obvious to people that the continents are not drifting, since we do not notice any such motion. It could also happen that a scientist has a valid theory but has not adequately explained, or experimentally tested that theory. Other scientists require evidence in order to accept a theory.
Which scientist propounded the conditioned reflex theory?
the russian scientist pavlov.
Why do scientist should be open minded?
Because if scientists aren't open-minded, they could try to discredit or change the results of a valid experiment, or not accept a theory that may actually be right, and discredit the theory, therefore stopping progress in science.
