0
What else can I help you with?
What does no conclusive mean?
"No conclusive" means that there is not enough evidence, information, or proof to confirm a definitive conclusion or decision. It indicates uncertainty or lack of finality in a particular situation or outcome.
Why doesn't science offer conclusive proof of phenomena?
Science cannot provide definitive proof of anything because nobody knows everything. You can always make another observation or take another measurement. That observation might possibly change our understanding of a phenomenon in some tiny way. It might even change it in such an important way that we have to re-think our understanding altogether. You can never be sure that nobody can think of a new explanation that accounts of all the observations of any given phenomenon up to now. But this lack of definitive proof does not stop science from providing reliable explanations of how nature works. Aircraft fly, mobile phones work, and vaccines prevent you from getting ill. All of these technological wonders depend on science, and we can be confident that the science on which they are based describes the world accurately. The more evidence available to science, the more accurate that description becomes, and the more confident you can be that the plane will not suddenly become subject to a previously unknown law that causes it to plummet to Earth. Science is a lot better than myth at explaining how to build, for example, a functional jet engine. Definitive proof is not, and has never been, the aim of science. Science is a careful mapping of nature, and just as a map is not the same thing as the land it maps, but always a simplification, science is never the same thing as the phenomena it describes, but always a simplification. As science progresses in any field, its predictions get closer and closer to observation. A scientific theory is a body of knowledge that makes accurate predictions and is utterly reliable for all practical purposes - like putting humans on the Moon.
Has earth been visited by aliens before?
There is no scientific evidence to confirm that Earth has been visited by aliens. Many reported sightings and encounters can be attributed to natural phenomena, human-made objects, or misinterpretations. The search for extraterrestrial life continues, but as of now, no conclusive proof of alien visits to Earth exists.
A scientist wants to know whether a particular cell is round or rectangular. How should the scientist observe the overall shape of the cell?
The scientist should use a light microscope.
What does no definite evidence mean?
"No definite evidence" means that there isn't clear or conclusive proof to support a particular claim or conclusion. It suggests that further investigation or research is needed to establish a stronger case or argument.
Why doesnt science offer conclusive proof of phonomena?
Science deals with building a body of knowledge through evidence-based investigations and observations. It aims to explain phenomena based on the available evidence but does not aim to offer absolute proof. This is because scientific understanding is always evolving with new evidence and perspectives.
Is there any existence of souls?
Yes there is and it can be proven scientifically. 1st Proof - Phenomena of Consciousness 2nd Proof - Phenomena of Memory 3rd Proof - Phenomena of Sleep 4th Proof - Phenomena of Dreams 5th Proof - Phenomena of Death 6th Proof - Phenomena of Psychical Research 7th Proof - Phenomena of Traveling Clairvoyance 8th Proof - Phenomena of Hypnotism
How can you put the word conclusive into a sentence?
There is no conclusive proof to support either view.
Study of animals for whose existence there is no conclusive proof?
This study is called cryptozoology.
Does the scientist have a proof that GOD EXIST?
No.
Is there any conclusive proof that ghosts are real?
Even with new technology there is still no conclusive proof that ghosts are in fact real. While believers point to orbs, shadows, and mist phenomenon caught on camera as "proof" no scientific peer reviewed literature exists on the topic. Until science takes on that cause it will always be a matter of belief.
What does no conclusive mean?
"No conclusive" means that there is not enough evidence, information, or proof to confirm a definitive conclusion or decision. It indicates uncertainty or lack of finality in a particular situation or outcome.
Does science offer conclusive proof for a theory?
Sometimes Yes, as in Pythagoras' Theorem. Other times No, for as Godel's Incompleteness Theorem shows, there will be complete bodies of knowledge in which there will be truths that cannot be proven, and falsities which cannot be denied. [I paraphrase his theorem.]
How long should one person talk in mobile phones so that it will be safe?
There is no conclusive proof that talking on a mobile phone is unsafe.
What does a scientist do if hypothsis is not supported?
make a new hypothesis. if not the scientist continues believing in their hypothesis without any proof and becomes a mad scientist
Why doesn't science offer conclusive proof of phenomena?
Science cannot provide definitive proof of anything because nobody knows everything. You can always make another observation or take another measurement. That observation might possibly change our understanding of a phenomenon in some tiny way. It might even change it in such an important way that we have to re-think our understanding altogether. You can never be sure that nobody can think of a new explanation that accounts of all the observations of any given phenomenon up to now. But this lack of definitive proof does not stop science from providing reliable explanations of how nature works. Aircraft fly, mobile phones work, and vaccines prevent you from getting ill. All of these technological wonders depend on science, and we can be confident that the science on which they are based describes the world accurately. The more evidence available to science, the more accurate that description becomes, and the more confident you can be that the plane will not suddenly become subject to a previously unknown law that causes it to plummet to Earth. Science is a lot better than myth at explaining how to build, for example, a functional jet engine. Definitive proof is not, and has never been, the aim of science. Science is a careful mapping of nature, and just as a map is not the same thing as the land it maps, but always a simplification, science is never the same thing as the phenomena it describes, but always a simplification. As science progresses in any field, its predictions get closer and closer to observation. A scientific theory is a body of knowledge that makes accurate predictions and is utterly reliable for all practical purposes - like putting humans on the Moon.
Why might a scientist reject a scientific theory?
there might not be enough proof
