An investigation may continue after results are accepted to explore deeper insights, validate findings through replication, or address any unresolved questions. This ongoing inquiry can help refine methodologies, uncover additional variables, or identify potential biases. Moreover, continued investigation can enhance the robustness of the conclusions and contribute to a broader understanding of the subject matter.
Its ability to generate reliable and valid results, adhere to ethical standards, and be subject to peer review and replication by other researchers.
How do scientists usually communicate and defend the results of an investigation
An investigation which is conducted under strictly controlled and monitored conditions is likely to result in mor reliable investigations.
Scientists analyze the results of a scientific investigation to draw conclusions, test hypotheses, and make interpretations. This helps to understand the implications of the research findings, identify patterns or connections, and determine if the data supports the original research question. Ultimately, analyzing the results is crucial for advancing scientific knowledge and ensuring the reliability of the research.
It is important for people to learn the results of an investigation for transparency, accountability, and to provide closure or justice for those affected by the situation. Understanding the findings can also help prevent similar incidents in the future and improve processes or policies.
Repetition is copying an investigation, while replication of an investigation is the results of an investigation, which is not likely to be accepted unless the investigation is repeated multiple times and the same result is obtained.
Repetition is copying an investigation, while replication of an investigation is the results of an investigation, which is not likely to be accepted unless the investigation is repeated multiple times and the same result is obtained.
Because the proof lies in doing the thing. If you cant do it again then there is no proof.
Results get published.
It is because maybe someone or some group would still like to investigate afterwards to possibly prove the acceptance wrong.
a valid investigation is an effective investigation i think. The results turn out to be what you had inferred.
Its ability to generate reliable and valid results, adhere to ethical standards, and be subject to peer review and replication by other researchers.
observation
reporting the results
They draft a hypothesis, investigate it. Next, they conduct several experiment's, if they can get good repeatable results others test it. Then it is improved or accepted and over time it may change or disappear completely.
How do scientists usually communicate and defend the results of an investigation
repeating a investigation can help to confirm your results. If you try an experiment once, it could be wrong so try it again and repeat it to confirm the results.