The Bohr's atom model is still used because of its simplicity, and its correct results for selected systems. The Bohr model is still taught to introduce students to quantum mechanics or energy level diagrams.
There is no N in Bohrs. But his first name was Neils
The theory of spontaneous generation is considered to be incorrect. It posited that living organisms could arise from nonliving matter spontaneously, without the need for reproduction. This theory was disproven through experiments by Louis Pasteur and others in the 19th century.
the planetary model
It does not. Cell theory is fully compatible with evolutionary theory. Does this mean we know everything about the evolution of cells? No. We say we do not know, not that cell theory shows that evolutionary theory is incorrect. ( except, of course, if you are referring to heritability. This Darwin got wrong, but this is not directly related to cell theory )
The Bohr's postulates of the compound nucleus theory state that the nucleus interacts with incident particles in a way analogous to a compound nucleus, formed as a result of a fusion reaction. This theory helps explain nuclear reactions and scattering processes involving isotopes of heavier elements. It provides a framework for understanding the behavior of nuclei in a variety of nuclear reactions.
There is no N in Bohrs. But his first name was Neils
god
is probably an incorrect theory
Caloric theory.
If all the evidence taken into consideration can be explained by the scientific model proposed and the model successfully predicts outcomes of experiments yet to be performed, it is a "good scientific theory" It still can be incorrect. If it is proven incorrect it should be abandoned.
The theory of spontaneous generation is considered to be incorrect. It posited that living organisms could arise from nonliving matter spontaneously, without the need for reproduction. This theory was disproven through experiments by Louis Pasteur and others in the 19th century.
yes it can
yes you can, in theory. But it is very difficult to change an established 'ruling paradigm' (however incorrect).
When there wrong about there theory. Like for example , if a scientist creates a new theory, but research proved it incorrect.
lemarck ideas of evolution are known as the inheritance of acquire characteristic what was incorrect about his theory of how organisms evole
Yes because he publicised his ideas well. He knew people in journals, wrote a lot and spoke to lots of people to persuade him of his ideas.
yes you can, in theory. But it is very difficult to change an established 'ruling paradigm' (however incorrect).