All we have to go on are mostly incomplete skeletons and primitive cave drawings/paintings and decayed/damaged remains of tools & utensils. Although forensic science can come up with very good facial features from complete skulls, general body shapes and sizes from complete skeletons, and approximations of clothing and customs from cave drawings and limited remains of cooking utensils, etc., we will probably never get an exact picture of early peoples.
got this from Yahoo answers lol
All we have to go on are mostly incomplete skeletons and primitive cave drawings/paintings and decayed/damaged remains of tools & utensils. Although forensic science can come up with very good facial features from complete skulls, general body shapes and sizes from complete skeletons, and approximations of clothing and customs from cave drawings and limited remains of cooking utensils, etc., we will probably never get an exact picture of early peoples. got this from Yahoo answers lol
All we have to go on are mostly incomplete skeletons and primitive cave drawings/paintings and decayed/damaged remains of tools & utensils. Although forensic science can come up with very good facial features from complete skulls, general body shapes and sizes from complete skeletons, and approximations of clothing and customs from cave drawings and limited remains of cooking utensils, etc., we will probably never get an exact picture of early peoples. got this from Yahoo answers lol
In "The Giver," Fiona is described as having red hair, which is significant in the context of the story as it symbolizes the ability to see beyond, or perceive deeper truths. Her physical appearance is also noted to be attractive, reflecting her youth and vitality. However, specific details about her height or build are not extensively elaborated upon in the text.
The narrator describes the stranger as having an unsettling and intriguing presence, noting features that are both striking and ambiguous. The stranger's attire is often depicted as unconventional, contributing to an air of mystery. The narrator may focus on specific details like the stranger's eyes or expression, which evoke a sense of curiosity and apprehension, suggesting that their appearance is emblematic of deeper complexities. Overall, the stranger's physical traits serve to enhance their enigmatic persona.
A conceptual model represents abstract ideas and relationships, providing a high-level overview without specific implementation details. In contrast, a physical model represents the concrete implementation of a system, including specific elements, attributes, and relationships at a detailed level.
it avoids discussion of the cultural significance of the details of his physical appearance.
Physical appearance can provide important cues and information about a person, such as age, gender, health, and emotions. These details can influence how we perceive and interact with others, guiding our social judgments and behaviors.
Tolkien may have left the appearance of goblins vague to allow readers to use their imagination and create their own scary images. By providing fewer details, he could also focus more on the actions and characteristics of the goblins, contributing to their menacing presence in the story. Additionally, leaving out specific physical descriptions may add to the mysterious and mythical quality of these creatures.
Topic Sentence
I'm sorry, but I cannot provide personal information about individuals, including details about their physical appearance.
In the essay "My Dungeon Shook: Letter to my Nephew on the One Hundredth Anniversary of the Emancipation," Rowan highlights Miss Bessie's physical appearance by describing her as a "tiny" yet formidable woman with "sharp" eyes and a direct gaze. He emphasizes her small stature as a contrast to her strong and impactful presence, showcasing her as a symbol of resilience and wisdom. These details are given in the context of discussing Miss Bessie's role as a teacher and mentor, illustrating her as a powerful figure in his life who left a lasting impression.
All we have to go on are mostly incomplete skeletons and primitive cave drawings/paintings and decayed/damaged remains of tools & utensils. Although forensic science can come up with very good facial features from complete skulls, general body shapes and sizes from complete skeletons, and approximations of clothing and customs from cave drawings and limited remains of cooking utensils, etc., we will probably never get an exact picture of early peoples. got this from yahoo answers lol
All we have to go on are mostly incomplete skeletons and primitive cave drawings/paintings and decayed/damaged remains of tools & utensils. Although forensic science can come up with very good facial features from complete skulls, general body shapes and sizes from complete skeletons, and approximations of clothing and customs from cave drawings and limited remains of cooking utensils, etc., we will probably never get an exact picture of early peoples. got this from Yahoo answers lol
All we have to go on are mostly incomplete skeletons and primitive cave drawings/paintings and decayed/damaged remains of tools & utensils. Although forensic science can come up with very good facial features from complete skulls, general body shapes and sizes from complete skeletons, and approximations of clothing and customs from cave drawings and limited remains of cooking utensils, etc., we will probably never get an exact picture of early peoples. got this from Yahoo answers lol
All we have to go on are mostly incomplete skeletons and primitive cave drawings/paintings and decayed/damaged remains of tools & utensils. Although forensic science can come up with very good facial features from complete skulls, general body shapes and sizes from complete skeletons, and approximations of clothing and customs from cave drawings and limited remains of cooking utensils, etc., we will probably never get an exact picture of early peoples. got this from Yahoo answers lol
All we have to go on are mostly incomplete skeletons and primitive cave drawings/paintings and decayed/damaged remains of tools & utensils. Although forensic science can come up with very good facial features from complete skulls, general body shapes and sizes from complete skeletons, and approximations of clothing and customs from cave drawings and limited remains of cooking utensils, etc., we will probably never get an exact picture of early peoples. got this from Yahoo answers lol
All we have to go on are mostly incomplete skeletons and primitive cave drawings/paintings and decayed/damaged remains of tools & utensils. Although forensic science can come up with very good facial features from complete skulls, general body shapes and sizes from complete skeletons, and approximations of clothing and customs from cave drawings and limited remains of cooking utensils, etc., we will probably never get an exact picture of early peoples. got this from Yahoo answers lol