That he's somewhat hypocritical, since Tybalt's this arrogant bully that saunters around boasting of his Fencing skills, and Mercutio mocks that, though he's pretty arrogant himself. But a lot argue that the main difference between them (and of Mercutio's arrogance) is that Mercutio really does have the skills that to rival Tybalt's, and he knows it.
We know the characters in a play from their actions; it is what they do which tells us who they are. A well-written character is who he is because of the choices he makes. Thus we know that Tybalt is a bully addicted to fighting not because Mercutio says so (after all, Mercutio could be mistaken or lying) but because he wants to disturb the party in 1,5 in order to start a fight, because we see him aggravating the fight in 1,1, and because he is roaming the streets looking for Romeo in 3,1 just so he can fight him. All of these actions tell us what kind of person Tybalt is, so perforce they have to be consistent with their characters.
they both like to fight and they hate each other
Both Tybalt and Mercutio can get angered easily and they are both immature.
human actions and emotions. :-)
when all characters move at different time but doing same actions
Yes they are
Shakespeare used the stereotype of the bumbling policeman in a number of plays, especially Dogberry and Elbow in Measure for Measure. In Shakespeare's day constables were underpaid and undertrained and so there was more truth in the stereotype back then than there is now.Comic relief are the stereotypes represented by the characters Dogberry, night watch constable, and Verges, Dogberry's partner, in the play Much Ado about Nothing by William Shakespeare (Baptized April 26, 1564 - April 23, 1616). The characterization is supposed to heighten comedic effects through the actions and dialogues of two bumbling law enforcers even though in reality such a depiction is inaccurate, insulting, unappreciative, and unnecessary.
Caesar defeated Pompey's sons and is returning back to Rome.
Yes they stopped playing games and such
Actually Shakespeare did not "write about" any characters at all, except when other characters are talking about them. Shakespeare created his characters by writing words for them to say and actions for them to do. He also created an awful lot of characters; if you pick up a copy of any Shakespeare play whatsoever, and look at the beginning where it lists the characters in that play (the Dramatis Personae), you will see the names of more than seven characters, guaranteed. Twelfth Night, a comedy, has fourteen characters, Macbeth, a tragedy, has about 28, the First Part of Henry VI, a history, has 37. Another hint: the names of 23 of Shakespeare's characters appear in the titles of his plays.
Yes, the characters in The Importance of Being Earnest by Oscar Wilde are consistent in their actions throughout the play. Their behaviors and decisions are driven by their desire to maintain their societal facades and preserve their reputations, leading to humorous situations where they continue to deceive each other and themselves in order to uphold appearances. This consistency in their actions adds to the comedic and satirical elements of the play.
When implementing a decision, a company must ensure that its actions remain consistent with its
The declarations that the colonial settlers made were not consistent with the actions they took. They said they wanted to make peace with England but still rebelled.
No. His words and His actions were completely consistent, I believe.
Malcolm and Macduff are both key characters in Shakespeare's play "Macbeth." They share a common goal of overthrowing Macbeth and restoring rightful rule to Scotland. Both characters are also deeply affected by the actions and consequences of Macbeth's reign.
Shakespeare uses characters' hallucinations in Macbeth to show their psychological unraveling, adding tension by blurring the lines between reality and imagination. These hallucinations, such as Macbeth seeing a floating dagger or Lady Macbeth's sleepwalking, highlight the characters' guilt and descent into madness, making the audience question what is real and what is a product of their guilty conscience. This heightens the suspense and drama in the play as the characters' actions become increasingly erratic and unpredictable.
Yes, they are very consistent! They were consistent because his way of looking at the suitors did not change one bit!
Oedipus' only motivation in his prior actions was to get away from his prophecy. His current actions were the result of wanting to get rid of the plague.
Most of them are, but I believe some are not, for instance Robert (???) Ferrars, the younger brother. Willoughby feels compelled to abandon his consistency, but he is nevertheless motivated. As I see it, some characters take sudden decisions, not always fully explained by the author.
Yes, odysseus has changed after the 20 years.!