Since this happens in Act 1 Scene 3, you probably have not had time to form an initial response before these things happen.
That he can frame them for murdering King Duncan is the reason that Macbeth gives himself for killing King Duncan's guards. That he is overcome with grief over his sovereign's murder is the reason that Macbeth gives to the king's escort.Specifically, Macbeth kills Duncan - his guest, relative and ruler - in Act II Scene II of the play "Macbeth" by William Shakespeare. He also kills the royal guards, in order to charge them with the crime and prevent them from defending themselves. His explanation when the king's escort comes for him in the morning is the need to exact his own form of justice on those who disrespect Duncan as their king and Macbeth as their host.
Actually, the 3 witches do not commit any acts of violence, in Macbeth. The Witches tell Macbeth of 3 prophesies, which make an enormous impact on him. The Witches represent darkness, chaos, turmoil, temptation and conflict. They manipulate Macbeth, to the point of not being able to recognize evil and good, and they not only venture to seek trouble and havoc for Macbeth but for all mortals. They never tell Macbeth to kill King Duncan but they use a subtle form of manipulation by tempting Macbeth with visions and prophecies that he is destined to be King. By manipulating him in this manner, the Witches are indirectly responsible for leading him to his own doom. The trouble they seek and set out to cause, is not their primary activity but they relish in their quest for trouble, and delight in helping mortals meet their doom.
It's contribution is in the fact that younger people watched it and had no idea they were actually watching Shakespeare. The detraction is that it is modernized and the feeling doesn't come through. All in all anything that makes younger viewers see Shakespeare in any form is a plus, and the script and acting was fantastic.
E've was used in Shakespeare's plays to be a shorten form of the word we've. We've is already a contraction but e've was a more popular use in his time.
Contractions are words that are created by joining two words with an apostrophe. Examples: "Do" and "not" form the contraction "don't""I" and "am" form the contraction "I'm""Where" and "is" form the contraction "where's"
You can write "will not" as a contraction by combining the two words to form "won't."
Shouldn't
"Let us" combine to form the contraction "let's".
A contraction means to make smaller. "They" and "Have" are already as small as they can get.If you meant to say, "They are" and "Have not", then the contracted form of those words is "They're" and "Haven't", respectively.
The contraction "mustn't" means "must not." Must is an auxiliary verb and not is an adverb.
No. "Its" is the possessive form of "It". "It's" is a contraction of "It is".
The name was created as a contraction of the words "Mosaic killer".
The contraction form (if that is what exactly is the question about) of the words should not is shouldn't.
The contraction shouldn't is made up of the verbshould and the adverb not (a shortened form of should not).
contraction
The contraction form of who is is who's.Example: Who's at the door?