0
What else can I help you with?
What are Deductive and Inductive argument means?
Deductive reasoning is drawing a specific conclusion from general principles or premises that are known to be true. It aims to provide certainty in the conclusion. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, involves making generalizations or probabilistic conclusions based on specific observations or evidence. It aims to provide strong support for the conclusion without guaranteeing absolute certainty.
Why is deductive reasonin stronger than inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger than inductive reasoning because it involves deriving specific conclusions from general principles or premises. This makes the conclusions more certain and reliable, as they logically follow from the given information. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations, which can lead to less certain or reliable results.
Inductive or deductive?
Both. Whereas an inductive argument proves only that its conclusion is likely given the premises, a deductive argument proves that the conclusion is certain given the premises. However, inductive reasoning allows more certainty in the premises themselves.Here is an example of a deductive argument:All swans are white. Jumping John is a swan. Therefore, Jumping John is white.We are certain that if the premises are true, the conclusion is also true. However, the premise "all swans are white" is not certain, as we would have to observe all swans ever to exist to prove it.Here is an example of an inductive argument:This swan is white. That swan is white. The other swan is white. Therefore, all swans are white.Although we have less certainty in the conclusion given the premises, we have more certainty in the premises themselves, having just observed them. Neither induction nor deduction is superior to the other.
What is deductive logical thought?
Deductive logical thought is a reasoning process in which a conclusion is derived from a set of premises through a series of logical steps. It involves moving from general statements to specific conclusions with certainty. It is used in mathematics, philosophy, and other fields to ensure valid arguments.
What are the three argument types?
The three argument types are deductive, inductive, and presumptive. Their differences are based on the strictness of the connection of the premises to the conclusion.Deductive: In a valid deductive argument, if the premises are true, by logical necessity, the conclusion must be true. There is a strict link between the premises and the conclusion. It is logically impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false. There are multiple types of deductive arguments shown in the related question below.Inductive: Not such a strict link between premises and the conclusion. Inductive is usually based on probability (and therefore may contain statistics and percentages). So if the premises are true, the conclusion is probably true. Keywords in an inductive argument include some, most, usually, typically, and other words that suggest that not all things mentioned in the premises are or do what is suggested. It is pretty much a yes or no argument, either deductively valid or not.Presumptive: In this case, the presumption is based on probability, it is tentatively acceptable if the premises are true. This type of argument is usually used when there is no evidence suggesting the contrary, in which case the argument would be proved wrong.
What are Deductive and Inductive argument means?
Deductive reasoning is drawing a specific conclusion from general principles or premises that are known to be true. It aims to provide certainty in the conclusion. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, involves making generalizations or probabilistic conclusions based on specific observations or evidence. It aims to provide strong support for the conclusion without guaranteeing absolute certainty.
Difference between deductive and inductive research with example?
Inductive research starts off with specific observations and move toward general ideas or theory to capture what they show. (Qualitative) Deductive Research starts with a general idea or theory and then moves to test it by looking at specific observations. (Quantitative)
What are Strengths and weaknesses of deductive and inductive research approaches?
Inductive research approaches are more widely used than Deductive by the scientific community, but they both have there strength and weaknesses. Inductive method: -Strengths: The inductive method produces concrete conclusions about nature that are backed by a variety of observational evidence. When one of an inductive arguments premises are perceived as false, other observational evidence can be added to the premises to save the argument, this is not the case with deductive reasoning. -Weaknesses: The inductive method produces conclusions that go beyond what there premises warrant. In other words, inductive arguments take a limited amount of observations to provide a universal conclusion, which could still be false. For example, someone observes 10,000 dogs and finds that they all have flees, then inductively concludes that all dogs have flees. This is a situation where overwhelming observational evidence (10,000 dogs have flees) points to an inductively reasoned false conclusion (All dogs have flees). Deductive Method: -Strengths: Deductive reasoning dosent require painstakingly observing a variety of observational evidence to reach a conclusion. One can start off with a generally accepted axiom, or statement, and deduce conclusions based on that axiom. -Weaknesses: Deductive reasoning can make permanent the logical fallacies we have today. In other words, if you use an axiom to deduce a variety of conclusions, and that axiom turns out to be false, all of the conclusions following that axiom are false as a result. hope this helps!
How different was Rene Descartes principle of reasoning with that of bacon?
Descartes reasoning was based on deriving principles that were then the premise of deductive reasoning. Bacon, on the other hand, used empirical observations that were then used for inductive reasoning.
What is the difference between inductive an deductive method?
Deductive reasoning is sometimes referred to as a "top down" approach, in other words deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. It often starts with a theory and is then narrowed down to an actual, testable hypothesis, that can be confirmed or denied by observation. Inductive reasoning is the inverse approach, a "bottom up" approach. It begins with an observation and through observation patterns and regularities are observed and can be applied to a more generalized theory.
What is the difference between the inductive and deductive method of enquiry?
In general, deductive logic takes a lot of information and tries to draw a conclusion from it. Inductive logic takes one piece of information and tries to generalize from there. That doesn't necessarily make one better than another... they are each important in different circumstances. In general science for instance, deductive logic is used most often. If you have a lot of observations, you might be able to figure out more about the subject of study. In interpersonal relationships, on the other hand, inductive logic is used most often. If one person reacts a certain way, then they figure that some other people will too. Both contribute to understanding, but are usually used very differently. I would also suggest looking up the terms in an online dictionary or encyclopedia, especially if you are asking about formal definitions.
Why is deductive reasonin stronger than inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger than inductive reasoning because it involves deriving specific conclusions from general principles or premises. This makes the conclusions more certain and reliable, as they logically follow from the given information. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations, which can lead to less certain or reliable results.
Is deductive reasoning using specific observations to make generalizations?
No, deductive reasoning works the other way around. It starts with general principles or premises and applies them to specific cases to reach a conclusion. In contrast, using specific observations to make generalizations is known as inductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning involves deriving broader conclusions based on specific examples or evidence.
What is a conclusion reached through inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning goes from a general to a specific instance. For example, if we say all primes other than two are odd, deductive reasoning would let us say that 210000212343848212 is not prime. Here is a more "classic"example of deductive reasoning. All apples are fruits All fruits grow on trees Therefore, all apples grow on trees
Do classical logic only apply to inductive logic?
No, classical logic primarily applies to deductive reasoning, which involves drawing specific conclusions from general premises. Inductive logic, on the other hand, involves making generalizations based on specific observations and does not guarantee the truth of the conclusions. While both forms of logic are important in reasoning, they serve different purposes and operate under different principles.
Inductive or deductive?
Both. Whereas an inductive argument proves only that its conclusion is likely given the premises, a deductive argument proves that the conclusion is certain given the premises. However, inductive reasoning allows more certainty in the premises themselves.Here is an example of a deductive argument:All swans are white. Jumping John is a swan. Therefore, Jumping John is white.We are certain that if the premises are true, the conclusion is also true. However, the premise "all swans are white" is not certain, as we would have to observe all swans ever to exist to prove it.Here is an example of an inductive argument:This swan is white. That swan is white. The other swan is white. Therefore, all swans are white.Although we have less certainty in the conclusion given the premises, we have more certainty in the premises themselves, having just observed them. Neither induction nor deduction is superior to the other.
What is deductive logical thought?
Deductive logical thought is a reasoning process in which a conclusion is derived from a set of premises through a series of logical steps. It involves moving from general statements to specific conclusions with certainty. It is used in mathematics, philosophy, and other fields to ensure valid arguments.
