answersLogoWhite

0

An historian can acknowledge personal bias by being transparent about their perspective and assumptions in their research. To stay true to the historic method, they can strive for objectivity by consulting multiple sources, analyzing evidence critically, and considering diverse perspectives to ensure a well-rounded interpretation of the past.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Philosophy

What are the Example of method of tenacity?

An example of the method of tenacity is when someone holds onto a belief or idea simply because they have always believed it to be true, despite evidence to the contrary. This method relies on personal experience and subjective feelings rather than external evidence or reasoning.


What was Socrates doctrine about?

Socrates' main doctrine revolved around the idea that "knowing oneself" is the key to a virtuous and fulfilling life. He believed that questioning and self-reflection were essential for personal growth and understanding of the world. His teachings and method of questioning, known as the Socratic method, emphasized critical thinking and the pursuit of truth.


How often does one use the Socratic method on a daily basis?

The frequency of using the Socratic method varies among individuals. Some may use it daily in professional settings to encourage critical thinking and problem-solving, while others may use it less frequently in casual conversations or educational contexts. Ultimately, the frequency of using the Socratic method depends on personal communication style and circumstances.


How does the concept of objectivity play a role in the scientific method and the pursuit of knowledge in the field of science?

Objectivity is crucial in the scientific method as it involves gathering and analyzing data without bias or personal beliefs influencing the results. This helps ensure that scientific findings are reliable and can be replicated by others, leading to the advancement of knowledge in the field of science.


Is phenomenology a qualitative or quantitative research method?

Phenomenology is a qualitative research method that focuses on exploring and understanding individuals' personal experiences, perspectives, and meanings they attribute to these experiences. It emphasizes describing and interpreting these subjective realities rather than quantifying them.

Related Questions

What historian uses comparative method?

Well Im sure any would use it


How are systematic method errors occur?

incorrect calibration of equipments,method used and also personal uncertainties


Where you used the scientific method to solve a personal problem?

sometimes you should use the scientific method for a science problem. but not for your personal problems you should never ever do that. it will cause affection in your life.


What is the abbreviation for method statement?

This is just personal opinion/preference, but I'd abbreviate the word 'Method' in software terminology as MTD.


What is a primary communications method for both personal and business use?

email


What method would be proper to use when encrypting personal information?

Tripe DES


Greek Historian author of History of the Peloponnesian war?

Herodotus


What Method for storing your Personal Flotation Devices?

The best method for storing personal floatation devices is to keep them next to each seat in the boat when you are on the water. You can also store them in a cabinet or bin as long as they are within easy reach if they are needed.


Why do some people believe that scientific method is more reliable than revelation?

why the saientific method more relible source own personal experience


The research method in cultural anthropology that relies on personal contact with people on?

Participant observation


Which method will help you recall information you read?

Sq4r


A historian uses the comparative method to?

A historian uses the comparative method to analyze similarities and differences between different historical events, societies, or cultures. This approach helps historians gain a deeper understanding of the factors that influenced these events and how they shaped the course of history. By comparing different cases, historians can identify patterns, trends, and variations that contribute to a more comprehensive interpretation of historical events.