0
War may bring temporary peace by subduing the opponent, but it often leads to long-term consequences such as destruction, loss of life, and ongoing conflict. Genuine and lasting peace is usually achieved through diplomacy, negotiation, and reconciliation between conflicting parties. War should be a last resort, as the cost is usually too high.
What else can I help you with?
Is peace an antonym?
It is an antonym of war. I'm not sure what you mean... the word peace can't be an antonym unless it's compared to its opposite, such as war.
Is war the solution of peace?
War is not the solution for peace. Peace can be achieved through diplomacy, communication, and mutual understanding. Resorting to war often leads to destruction and loss of life, making it counterproductive to the goal of establishing lasting peace.
Do you need war to have peace?
yes war is necessary for peace. The people who say war never solved anything have obviously never heard of slavery, nazism, or merceless dictatorships...so i guess the answer to the question is sometimes. Guess now the question would be who should determine when war is necessary...
What is the verb of peacefulness?
The verb of peacefulness is peacefully. As in "to peacefully do something". The verb meaning "to bring peace" is "pacify".
What is the paradoxical meaning of go to war for peace?
You can't always have peace by being peaceful, sometimes you have to fight a war to obtain peace, because no matter how peaceful you may be, you can still be invaded by some other less peaceful country. War is the opposite of peace, so it is paradoxical that you might have to use war to obtain peace. No matter how much you dislike war, even if you think it is absolutely the worst possible thing, you may still have to fight one. World War One was described at the time as "the war to end all wars" although this tragically proved to be quite wrong. We try to create peace by defeating the people who want war, yet even when we do so, there always seems to be a new reason for war. So, we can observe that even though we sometimes have to go to war in order to have peace, that is not a complete solution. We need a more evolved form of human civilization, in order to have a lasting peace. But we may have to go to war, on the way to achieving that objective. And in the nuclear age, war is more dangerous than ever before. It is possible that we may someday have a war that is so destructive that it will finally result in the peace of the grave, for everyone. That too will be a paradoxical outcome, a war that everybody loses.
How can war bring peace to the world?
Eventually.
What were two of the most important steps that took in japan following the war?
To bring peace not war.
What did the Russo-Japanese war do to bring out peace?
Type your answer here... Nothing. A war over territory like the Russo-Japanese War never brings peace, it just disrupts it.
What were two of the most important steps that MacArthur took in Japan following the war?
To bring peace not war.
Did president Truman bring peace to the Korean war?
No- the war was still going on when Truman left office.
Who had a plan to bring peace to Europe after World War 1?
Albert Einstein
Why would General Lee bring the war into the north?
To cause the US to negotiate with the Confederacy for a peace treaty to end the war. So long as all battles were fought in the South, there was little incentive to seek peace. The intent was to bring the war home to the Union.
Did the Korean war bring peace between the north and south?
The Korean War brought an Armistice. An Armistice is a truce.
What did Europe do to bring order after the war?
After the war europeans decided to start the european union(EU) in order to maintain peace.
What peace conference was held to bring World War 1 to an end?
it was held in Paris and Versailles
How did the US bring peace to the Cambodian Civil war?
Well the US can be blamed as a major influence in causing the civil war in Cambodia so why not ask how they destroyed peace in cambodia instead.
In order to maintain peace you must prepare for war. this is a debate topic where i am the affirmative. any suggestions for arguments?
In order to maintain peace, nothing can bring discord. Attacks on your homeland can bring discord, unless you can successfully defend the homeland. Preparing for war allows you to defend yourself. Therefore, preparing for war insures no discord from attacks, and thus, insures that peace is maintained.
