If we look at astronomers, they approached "an argument" through using theories. A theory is an idea, an educated guess gained from observations, experience, and an ability to challenge usually accepted thinking. So, early thinkers challenged and hypothesized:
So think about what your theory might be if you have no direct evidence. Back up your theory with your ideas of what the facts might be-- IF you could get to any direct evidence.
An example:
Do you think earthworms live below the soil layer?
You cannot dig to the center of the earth, so you cannot prove that earthworms don't live in the earth. You know earthworms like soil. They break down debris to make soil.
You know there is rock below soil. (bedrock) You know the inner core of the earth is hot.
Your theory: Earthworms cannot live in rock beneath the soil layer because that area would not give them food and water they need to survive. If the living environment is too hot, earthworms would shrivel and die just like when they stay too long on a sidewalk on a hot day.
Now, expand on your theory, giving ideas you have about why earthworms would only live in Earth's soil layer.
A supporting piece of evidence is information that validates or strengthens an argument or claim. It can include statistics, research findings, examples, anecdotes, expert opinions, or direct quotes from credible sources that provide more context or credibility to the main argument.
Providing evidence to support an argument strengthens it by adding credibility and persuasiveness. It shows that the argument is based on facts and research, making it more convincing to the audience.
An argument is a claim or viewpoint that is supported by evidence or reasons. Supporting evidence can include facts, statistics, examples, expert opinions, or logical reasoning that back up the argument being made. It is important to use strong and relevant evidence to persuade others and strengthen the validity of the argument.
It is very important to examine the evidence of an argument in order to come to a valid conclusion for said argument. If one does not have all the evidence, an invalid conclusion could be made.
The argument from silence is when the absence of evidence is used to either support or refute a claim or theory. If there is no evidence to support a claim, it can be refuted using the argument from silence. Conversely, if there is a lack of evidence against a claim, it can be supported using the argument from silence.
When you use the direct approach, the main idea (such as a recommendation, conclusion, or request) comes in the "top" of the document, followed by the evidence.
Direct approach of business letter writing is when the main point or purpose of the letter comes first followed by the evidence.
Indirect evidence should be used when you don't have direct or conclusive proof of a particular fact or conclusion but have supporting information that implies it. It can help build a stronger case or argument when direct evidence is lacking or ambiguous. Indirect evidence can be particularly useful in investigations, historical research, and scientific inquiries.
A supporting piece of evidence is information that validates or strengthens an argument or claim. It can include statistics, research findings, examples, anecdotes, expert opinions, or direct quotes from credible sources that provide more context or credibility to the main argument.
Evidence to support the argument is needed for a sound argument.
evidence to support the argument
Providing evidence to support an argument strengthens it by adding credibility and persuasiveness. It shows that the argument is based on facts and research, making it more convincing to the audience.
An argument is a claim or viewpoint that is supported by evidence or reasons. Supporting evidence can include facts, statistics, examples, expert opinions, or logical reasoning that back up the argument being made. It is important to use strong and relevant evidence to persuade others and strengthen the validity of the argument.
An argument from silence is an argument based on the absence of something being mentioned in documents as evidence.
It is very important to examine the evidence of an argument in order to come to a valid conclusion for said argument. If one does not have all the evidence, an invalid conclusion could be made.
An analogy can be persuasive, or it can help people to understand your argument, but it isnt EVIDENCE.
An argument from design is a theological term for a teleological argument - an argument for the existence of God, such that because nature is orderly, it is evidence of a designer.