There is no concrete evidence to support the claim that Elon Musk's education is fake. Musk attended the University of Pretoria and the University of Pennsylvania, where he studied physics and economics. He later dropped out of a PhD program at Stanford University to pursue his entrepreneurial ventures. While some critics question the extent of his formal education, Musk's success in various industries suggests that his knowledge and skills are real.
The argument from silence is when the absence of evidence is used to either support or refute a claim or theory. If there is no evidence to support a claim, it can be refuted using the argument from silence. Conversely, if there is a lack of evidence against a claim, it can be supported using the argument from silence.
There is evidence to suggest that Elon Musk may have exaggerated or misrepresented his educational background, particularly regarding his claim of having two degrees from Stanford University. This claim has been disputed by the university and there are discrepancies in Musk's own statements about his education.
The best question to ask when selecting evidence to support a claim is "Is the evidence credible and reliable?" It is essential to ensure that the evidence comes from a trustworthy source and is backed up by relevant data or research.
Every argument should have a claim or thesis, evidence to support the claim, and reasoning that connects the evidence to the claim. Arguments are structured to persuade others of a particular viewpoint or position.
An argument typically consists of a claim or thesis, evidence to support that claim, reasoning or analysis to explain how the evidence supports the claim, and a counterargument or acknowledgment of opposing views. Additionally, arguments may also include warrants (assumptions that connect the evidence to the claim), backing (further support for the warrants), and qualifiers (limitations or conditions under which the argument is valid).
An argument typically consists of a claim, evidence to support that claim, and reasoning that explains how the evidence supports the claim. The claim is the main point being made, the evidence provides support or proof for the claim, and the reasoning connects the evidence to the claim.
Is the evidence from the best source I can find
Yes, DNA testing can provide evidence to support the claim that he is not the father.
Fjh
The argument from silence is when the absence of evidence is used to either support or refute a claim or theory. If there is no evidence to support a claim, it can be refuted using the argument from silence. Conversely, if there is a lack of evidence against a claim, it can be supported using the argument from silence.
The evidence presented in court, such as witness testimony, documents, and physical evidence, supports the claim being made by the party.
Does this evidence support what I am trying to say
There is evidence to suggest that Elon Musk may have exaggerated or misrepresented his educational background, particularly regarding his claim of having two degrees from Stanford University. This claim has been disputed by the university and there are discrepancies in Musk's own statements about his education.
Does this evidence relate to what I am saying
Does this evidence relate to what I am saying
Evidence together with argument as to how the evidence makes the claim (the proposition that someone is claiming to be true) more credible.
explain how your evidence supports your claim