Crito argues that Socrates should escape prison to avoid an unjust death, while Socrates believes it is his duty to accept his punishment as a citizen of Athens, even if he disagrees with it. Crito focuses on the practical consequences, while Socrates prioritizes principles of justice and the social contract.
Socrates used his method of questioning to undermine Crito's arguments and challenge his assumptions. Socrates employed logic and reason to expose inconsistencies in Crito's reasoning, making it difficult for Crito to maintain control of the argument. Additionally, Socrates' conviction and commitment to his beliefs made it challenging for Crito to sway him to a different perspective.
The main difference between Crito's and Socrates's arguments is their stance on whether one should escape from prison. Crito argues that Socrates should escape to avoid unjust treatment and to prevent harm to his friends, while Socrates believes it is more important to adhere to the laws of the state and accept his punishment.
Crito argues from a perspective of practicality and self-interest, advocating for Socrates to escape prison to avoid an unjust death. Socrates, on the other hand, focuses on principles of justice and upholding the laws of the city, even if they lead to his own death. Socrates prioritizes his commitment to truth and virtue over personal safety, while Crito emphasizes the importance of avoiding harm and seeking self-preservation.
Crito visited Socrates in prison to persuade him to escape, believing it was unjust for Socrates to be executed. Crito also wanted to help Socrates avoid the consequences of not escaping.
Crito and Plato Crito and Plato
Crito says to do what people think is right, but Socrates says you must do what you think is right.
Crito says to do what people think is right, but Socrates says you must do what you think is right.
Crito says to do what people think is right, but Socrates says you must do what you think is right.
Crito says to do what people think is right, but Socrates says you must do what you think is right.
Socrates used his method of questioning to undermine Crito's arguments and challenge his assumptions. Socrates employed logic and reason to expose inconsistencies in Crito's reasoning, making it difficult for Crito to maintain control of the argument. Additionally, Socrates' conviction and commitment to his beliefs made it challenging for Crito to sway him to a different perspective.
The main difference between Crito's and Socrates's arguments is their stance on whether one should escape from prison. Crito argues that Socrates should escape to avoid unjust treatment and to prevent harm to his friends, while Socrates believes it is more important to adhere to the laws of the state and accept his punishment.
Crito says to do what people think is right, but Socrates says you must do what you think is right.
Crito says to do what people think is right, but Socrates says you must do what you think is right
Crito argues from a perspective of practicality and self-interest, advocating for Socrates to escape prison to avoid an unjust death. Socrates, on the other hand, focuses on principles of justice and upholding the laws of the city, even if they lead to his own death. Socrates prioritizes his commitment to truth and virtue over personal safety, while Crito emphasizes the importance of avoiding harm and seeking self-preservation.
Crito and Plato Crito and Plato
Crito visited Socrates in prison to persuade him to escape, believing it was unjust for Socrates to be executed. Crito also wanted to help Socrates avoid the consequences of not escaping.
He is using Crito as a sounding board present differing opinions and inviting his students to discriminate between differing arguments - mind training.