Supporters of annexing the Philippines believed that it would provide economic benefits, such as new markets for American goods and resources for American industries. They also saw it as an opportunity to spread American influence and values in the region, as well as a way to establish a strategic military presence in Asia.
Supporters of annexing the Philippines after the Spanish-American War believed it was America's duty to bring civilization and modernization to the islands, as well as expand American influence in the region. They also argued that it was necessary to prevent other powers from taking control of the Philippines.
Pros of annexing the Philippines: potential economic benefits through access to resources and labor, strategic military presence in the region, potential for increased stability and development in the region. Cons of annexing the Philippines: potential for resistance and conflict from the Filipino population, high cost of administration and infrastructure development, ethical concerns about imposing colonial rule on another nation.
Economic benefits: Advocates argued that annexing the Philippines would open up new markets for American goods and provide access to valuable resources, such as sugar and minerals, which could boost the American economy. Strategic importance: Supporters believed that having control over the Philippines would strengthen America's military presence in the Pacific region, allowing the U.S. to project power and protect its interests in Asia and beyond.
Supporters of the annexation of the Philippines argued that it would provide economic opportunities for American businesses, offer strategic military advantages in the Pacific region, promote American values and democracy, and fulfill a sense of moral obligation to uplift and civilize the Filipino people.
The Philippines is a predominantly Christian country, with a large portion of the population believing in God. The majority of Filipinos are Roman Catholics, with a significant number also belonging to other Christian denominations. There is also a minority Muslim population in the southern part of the country.
Supporters of annexing the Philippines after the Spanish-American War believed it was America's duty to bring civilization and modernization to the islands, as well as expand American influence in the region. They also argued that it was necessary to prevent other powers from taking control of the Philippines.
define imperialism
Yes.
True.
Pros of annexing the Philippines: potential economic benefits through access to resources and labor, strategic military presence in the region, potential for increased stability and development in the region. Cons of annexing the Philippines: potential for resistance and conflict from the Filipino population, high cost of administration and infrastructure development, ethical concerns about imposing colonial rule on another nation.
Many would say the US was acting as an imperial power when it annexed the Philippines, not that it was being communist.
Economic benefits: Advocates argued that annexing the Philippines would open up new markets for American goods and provide access to valuable resources, such as sugar and minerals, which could boost the American economy. Strategic importance: Supporters believed that having control over the Philippines would strengthen America's military presence in the Pacific region, allowing the U.S. to project power and protect its interests in Asia and beyond.
The main economic argument for annexing the Philippines centered on the potential for increased trade and access to Asian markets. Advocates believed that controlling the Philippines would provide the United States with a strategic base for commerce in Asia, particularly with China. Additionally, the islands offered valuable resources and opportunities for investment, which could bolster the U.S. economy and enhance its global influence.
A centralized (strategic) region to place military forces (bases); against the proposed enemy, Japan.
they like dongs
Reducing tax rates for businesses and wealthy individuals. Supporters of supply side economics believe in reducing tax rates for businesses and wealthy individuals. - See more at: http://www.chacha.com/question/what-do-supporters-of-supply-side-economics-believe#sthash.hxt2Ko2g.dpuf Supporters of supply side economics believe in reducing tax rates for businesses and wealthy individuals. - See more at: http://www.chacha.com/question/what-do-supporters-of-supply-side-economics-believe#sthash.hxt2Ko2g.dpuf
I believe it has something to do with what they did. Supporters did less tjan Sponsors.