answersLogoWhite

0

He insults his opponent to distract from the real argument. (apex)

User Avatar

Jake

Lvl 7
4y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Philosophy

Which word from abbeys passage best demonstrates the ad hominem fallacy in his argument?

The word "incompetent" in Abbey's passage best demonstrates the ad hominem fallacy, as it attacks the character or abilities of the opponent rather than addressing the substance of the argument.


What is the difference between a formal fallacy and an informal fallacy?

A formal fallacy is a mistake in the logical structure of an argument, while an informal fallacy is an error in the content or context of the argument.


What if an argument does not commit a fallacy?

If an argument does not commit a fallacy, it means that the reasoning provided supports the conclusion without any logical errors. This indicates that the argument is valid and that the premises lead to a justifiable conclusion. It also suggests that the argument is logically sound and can be considered a strong or persuasive piece of reasoning.


Can you identify the fallacy in the argument presented?

The fallacy in the argument presented is called ad hominem, which involves attacking the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself.


What is a fallacy in which a claim or argument is rejected the basis of some unrelated fact about the person presenting the argument?

Ad Hominem fallacy - it occurs when an argument is rebutted by attacking the person making the argument rather than the argument itself. This fallacy is committed when one tries to refute an argument by attacking the person's character, motive, or other attribute.

Related Questions

What word from Abbeys passage best demonstrates ad hominem fallacy in his argument?

Slob. -Apex


What type of fallacy does abbeys argument contain?

The argument contains the fallacy of hasty generalization, where Abbey makes a broad generalization about all rich people based on a limited sample size of five individuals. This does not provide sufficient evidence to support his claim.


Which word from abbeys passage best demonstrates the ad hominem fallacy in his argument?

The word "incompetent" in Abbey's passage best demonstrates the ad hominem fallacy, as it attacks the character or abilities of the opponent rather than addressing the substance of the argument.


What is the difference between a formal fallacy and an informal fallacy?

A formal fallacy is a mistake in the logical structure of an argument, while an informal fallacy is an error in the content or context of the argument.


A fallacy is basically a what?

A fallacy is basically an argument with poor reasoning. An argument can be considered to be fallacious even if the conclusion is true or not.


What if an argument does not commit a fallacy?

If an argument does not commit a fallacy, it means that the reasoning provided supports the conclusion without any logical errors. This indicates that the argument is valid and that the premises lead to a justifiable conclusion. It also suggests that the argument is logically sound and can be considered a strong or persuasive piece of reasoning.


Can you identify the fallacy in the argument presented?

The fallacy in the argument presented is called ad hominem, which involves attacking the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself.


What is a misleading argument called?

Fallacy


What will make an argument weaker?

fallacy


What is a fallacy in which a claim or argument is rejected the basis of some unrelated fact about the person presenting the argument?

Ad Hominem fallacy - it occurs when an argument is rebutted by attacking the person making the argument rather than the argument itself. This fallacy is committed when one tries to refute an argument by attacking the person's character, motive, or other attribute.


What is an ad hominem fallacy?

An ad hominem fallacy is when an argument attacks a person's character or traits instead of addressing the actual issue being discussed. It is considered a logical fallacy because attacking the person making an argument does not invalidate the argument itself.


What does a fallacy do to an argument in a debat?

it makes it weaker