wap
Deductive reasoning is reasoning that starts with general principles to form a conclusion about a specific case. To formulate a deductive argument, you should take a general idea or concept, like an ideology or commonly shared moral view and relate it to a more specific subject that links to your side of the argument. Inductive reasoning is the exact opposite; it involves developing a set of specific facts to create a general principle. To formulate an inductive argument, you should take a set of related facts and link them to an overarching moral or concept that supports your argument.
A deductive argument starts from a general principle or premise and uses it to logically conclude a more specific statement. This type of argument moves from the general to the specific, showing how the premise leads to a certain conclusion through valid reasoning.
Deductive arguments are more common than inductive arguments. Deductive reasoning begins with a general statement and applies it to a specific case, leading to a certain conclusion. Inductive reasoning begins with specific observations and generates a general hypothesis.
That type of argument is known as deductive reasoning. It involves drawing a specific conclusion based on a general premise or set of premises.
Valid ArgumentThanks to the above answerer, I got this question wrong on my quiz.The correct answer is Valid argument.
Deductive reasoning is reasoning that starts with general principles to form a conclusion about a specific case. To formulate a deductive argument, you should take a general idea or concept, like an ideology or commonly shared moral view and relate it to a more specific subject that links to your side of the argument. Inductive reasoning is the exact opposite; it involves developing a set of specific facts to create a general principle. To formulate an inductive argument, you should take a set of related facts and link them to an overarching moral or concept that supports your argument.
A deductive argument starts from a general principle or premise and uses it to logically conclude a more specific statement. This type of argument moves from the general to the specific, showing how the premise leads to a certain conclusion through valid reasoning.
Deductive arguments are more common than inductive arguments. Deductive reasoning begins with a general statement and applies it to a specific case, leading to a certain conclusion. Inductive reasoning begins with specific observations and generates a general hypothesis.
That type of argument is known as deductive reasoning. It involves drawing a specific conclusion based on a general premise or set of premises.
A Priori
Valid ArgumentThanks to the above answerer, I got this question wrong on my quiz.The correct answer is Valid argument.
A deductive argument fits this description. In a deductive argument, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This type of argument moves from general premises to a specific conclusion through logical reasoning.
Inductive arguments use specific examples to draw a general conclusion, while deductive arguments start with a general principle and apply it to specific cases.
Yes, arguments can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion, which is known as a deductive argument. They can also move from a general premise to a general conclusion, which is known as an inductive argument. The structure and validity of the argument depend on the relationship between the premise and conclusion.
An argument in which the author presents a general conclusion before listing observed specifics is an inductive argument. Inductive reasoning involves moving from specific observations to broader generalizations or conclusions.
preamble, which presents four premises followed by a conclusion (apex)
A deductive argument starts from a more general idea to reach a more specific conclusion. It involves moving from a premise that is universally accepted to a specific conclusion that logically follows from that premise.