WHAT does that even make sense!@#$%^&*()((()())())!@#$%^&*()_+~`-=+?/"'.>,<!
When water evaporates, the water molecules gain energy from the surroundings to overcome intermolecular forces and escape into the air as vapor. While the water loses mass during evaporation, this mass is not lost but rather converted into the potential energy of the water vapor. Therefore, the total mass and energy of the system (water and surroundings) remains constant, demonstrating conservation of mass and energy.
Yes. Basically, energy is ALWAYS conserved. The popular saying, that in a nuclear reaction mass is converted to energy, is plainly wrong, since both mass and energy are conserved. Read about "mass deficit", for example in the Wikipedia, for more details.
Energy is not conserved in some situations, especially in processes involving non-conservative forces like friction or air resistance. The conservation of mass, acceleration, and momentum are fundamental principles in physics.
Energy is ALWAYS conserved. The appropriate sum of mass and energy is always conserved. If an atom emits a photon, the atom has less energy/mass, and the universe minus that atom has more energy/mass. It's like carrying some energy from here to there.
Energy is always conserved in a closed system, according to the law of conservation of energy. However, in the universe as a whole, energy may not be conserved due to the expansion of space-time, which can lead to a net increase in energy.
When water evaporates, the water molecules gain energy from the surroundings to overcome intermolecular forces and escape into the air as vapor. While the water loses mass during evaporation, this mass is not lost but rather converted into the potential energy of the water vapor. Therefore, the total mass and energy of the system (water and surroundings) remains constant, demonstrating conservation of mass and energy.
In the beginning of the 20th century. He proposed mass-energy equivalence in 1905, and set out to mathematically express this. E = mc2 shows that energy can be converted into mass, and mass into energy. Thus, we no longer say that mass is conserved, or energy is conserved. But rather, we say that mass-energy is conserved.
Mass and energy
Both mass and charge
when water evpourates it turns into vapour and is present in the atmosphere in the form moisture so mass is conserved
Yes. Basically, energy is ALWAYS conserved. The popular saying, that in a nuclear reaction mass is converted to energy, is plainly wrong, since both mass and energy are conserved. Read about "mass deficit", for example in the Wikipedia, for more details.
While overall ENERGY has to be conserved, MASS does not. In a nuclear reaction mass can be converted into energy so the mass of the products may be less than the mass of the reactants. The difference in mass is converted into energy as Einstein's equation describes (E=MC squared). In a chemical reaction MASS has to be conserved.
Energy is not conserved in some situations, especially in processes involving non-conservative forces like friction or air resistance. The conservation of mass, acceleration, and momentum are fundamental principles in physics.
When balancing a chemical equation, the number of each type of atom on the reactant side must be equal to the number of each type of atom on the product side. Mass and charge are conserved during a chemical reaction as well.
Energy is ALWAYS conserved. The appropriate sum of mass and energy is always conserved. If an atom emits a photon, the atom has less energy/mass, and the universe minus that atom has more energy/mass. It's like carrying some energy from here to there.
False. Both mass and energy are conserved.
Energy is always conserved in a closed system, according to the law of conservation of energy. However, in the universe as a whole, energy may not be conserved due to the expansion of space-time, which can lead to a net increase in energy.