A neutrino is lighter than the photon
The energy of a photon is inversely propotional to its wavelength. The wavelength of a blue photon is less than that of a red photon. That makes the blue photon more energetic. Or how about this? The energy of a photon is directly proportional to its frequency. The frequency of a blue photon is greater than that of a red photon. That makes the blue photon more energetic. The wavelength of a photon is inversely proportional to its frequency. The the longer the wavelength, the lower the frequency. The shorter the wavelength, the higher the frequency.
No, it could not. A blue photon carries more energy than a red photon, since the blue photon's frequency is higher. That means one red photon wouldn't deliver enough energy to the atom to give it the energy to emit a blue photon.
It's the basic unit of light and other forms of electromagnetic radiation. If you're asking if it's "light" in the weight sense, yes. It has a rest mass of zero; you can't get lighter than that.
Yes, a photon with a wavelength of 420nm contains more energy than a photon with a wavelength of 790nm. This is because energy is inversely proportional to wavelength, meaning shorter wavelengths have higher energy.
The energy of a photon of ultraviolet radiation is greater than the energy of an average photon of sunlight because ultraviolet radiation has higher frequencies and shorter wavelengths, which correspond to higher energy photons. The difference in energy can be significant, with ultraviolet photons having several times more energy than photons of sunlight.
A photon.
dakota
yes, anything with a lower atomic number would be lighter, for example, helium is lighter than air, which is why balloons float when filled with helium... the lighter substance rises above the heavier....
In fact there are seven elements lighter than oxygen: hydrogen, helium, lithium, beryllium, boron, carbon and nitrogen.
The energy of a photon is inversely propotional to its wavelength. The wavelength of a blue photon is less than that of a red photon. That makes the blue photon more energetic. Or how about this? The energy of a photon is directly proportional to its frequency. The frequency of a blue photon is greater than that of a red photon. That makes the blue photon more energetic. The wavelength of a photon is inversely proportional to its frequency. The the longer the wavelength, the lower the frequency. The shorter the wavelength, the higher the frequency.
No, it could not. A blue photon carries more energy than a red photon, since the blue photon's frequency is higher. That means one red photon wouldn't deliver enough energy to the atom to give it the energy to emit a blue photon.
Anything less than that of 1 cubic meter? Many things...
Another photon approaching at the speed of light. Photons have no sensory organs so they cannot "see" anything.
yes, exemple; photon and electricity
he duble hockey sticks no.
It's the basic unit of light and other forms of electromagnetic radiation. If you're asking if it's "light" in the weight sense, yes. It has a rest mass of zero; you can't get lighter than that.
The interrogative pronouns are: who, whom, what, which, whose.Example sentences:Who says your mobile phone is lighter than this laptop?For whom is your mobile phone lighter than this laptop?What tells you that your mobile phone is lighter than this laptop?Which of your mobile phones is lighter than this laptop?Your mobile phone is lighter than whose laptop?