Protons have a mass of 1.00728 amu, electrons have a mass of 0.0005486 amu
[An anti-proton is the "dark side" to a proton. An anti-proton is formed when a proton was accelerated and then his something solid, breaking it apart. An electron is a negatively charged subatomic particle.] This is somewhat correct, but my understanding is that A proton is a structure of Two Up quarks (uu) and a Down quark (d) and a positron, or anti-electron. an antiproton has the same mass as a proton, and instead is made of two U-Bar Antiquarks and one D-bar antiquark, and an electron. I am not sure if this is completely correct, but if a proton and a antiproton, sometimes called a negiton, are combined they will Annihilate each other, creating a burst of energy. Quantum physics is a wierd science, so I could be very wrong indeed.
Inaccurate statement as a hydrogen IS the proton. An atom is made up of the nucleus which contains protons and neutrons and the electrons. A Protium or Hydrogen-1 contains 1 proton and no neutrons, it however has 1 electron which makes up very little of the mass so you could say that. 1 electron is 1/1834 the mass of a proton. So hydrogen is ~ 1+ 5.4875×10^-4 amu
The smallest amount of excess charge that a tape could possibly have is the charge carried by a single electron or proton. The charge of a single electron is approximately -1.6 x 10^-19 coulombs.
Beta was just assigned, when categorising ionising radiations, to what is now known as an electron. It was just a name and the Greek alphabet is commonly used for such things in physics, but is could have been Bernhard or George. As for the term "electron", I Googled "electron etymology" and got this quote from the Online Etymology Dictionary: "Coined 1891 by Irish physicist George J. Stoney (1826-1911) from electric + -on, as in ion.
Other properties that could be used to classify coins include their size, weight, shape, metal composition, and denomination. These characteristics help distinguish coins from each other and can aid in organizing and categorizing a collection based on different criteria.
A neutron could split into a proton plus an electron during the radioactive decay..
[An anti-proton is the "dark side" to a proton. An anti-proton is formed when a proton was accelerated and then his something solid, breaking it apart. An electron is a negatively charged subatomic particle.] This is somewhat correct, but my understanding is that A proton is a structure of Two Up quarks (uu) and a Down quark (d) and a positron, or anti-electron. an antiproton has the same mass as a proton, and instead is made of two U-Bar Antiquarks and one D-bar antiquark, and an electron. I am not sure if this is completely correct, but if a proton and a antiproton, sometimes called a negiton, are combined they will Annihilate each other, creating a burst of energy. Quantum physics is a wierd science, so I could be very wrong indeed.
Inaccurate statement as a hydrogen IS the proton. An atom is made up of the nucleus which contains protons and neutrons and the electrons. A Protium or Hydrogen-1 contains 1 proton and no neutrons, it however has 1 electron which makes up very little of the mass so you could say that. 1 electron is 1/1834 the mass of a proton. So hydrogen is ~ 1+ 5.4875×10^-4 amu
The particle that most resembles a proton could either be a neutron or an electron, and we'll have to explain that. The proton has about the same mass as the neutron, while the electron has only about 1/1836th the mass of a proton. The masses of the proton and neutron are similar. And both particles are found in the nucleus of atoms. The proton has the same electrical field strength as an electron (only of opposite polarity), while the neutron has no charge. The proton and electron have the same coulomb charge on them, except the sign of the charge. Both particles are carriers of fundamental electrical charges. In these two ways, the proton could be said to be like either the neutron or electron. And how the observer "looks" at them will determine which "likeness" he sees.
Different possible outcomes, depending on the energy of the collision. At low energies the electron and proton could combine to form a Hydrogen atom. At high energies the collision can produce pions and other particles.
Color and volatility
No. A proton could be considered a hydrogen ion or hydrogen nucleus, but a hydrogen atom must also contain an electron.
.The electron is a subatomic particle that carries a negative electrical charge.(The proton carries a positive charge, and the neutron carries no charge.)In the atom the electron is negatively charged.
Electrons do not fit inside a proton or neutron. Electrons move around the nucleus where the protons and electrons are, and the mount of electrons depends on the atom. For a neutral atom the number of electrons = the number of protons. If that does not hold true the atom will receive a (+) or (-) charge. It will be a (+) if it is missing one electron and a (-) if it has an extra electron. To the guy who wrote that, the question was asking (in size) how many electrons could fit inside a proton relative to its size. The answer is about 1/1836 electrons could fit inside a proton.
The smallest amount of excess charge that a tape could possibly have is the charge carried by a single electron or proton. The charge of a single electron is approximately -1.6 x 10^-19 coulombs.
It could be considered merely a quibble, but the proton has not been considered to be an "elementary particle" for many decades now. :-}However, as far as "what energy is needed for an electron to break up a proton?" The question, I suppose is: What would you consider to be "broken up", as far as an electron hitting a proton is concerned? I suppose you wouldn't consider the capture of the electron by the proton, to become a neutron (with the emission of an electron neutrino) to be "breaking up" the proton. So what does qualify?If one would only accept a "breaking up" of the proton into constituent quarks for an answer, then I'm afraid we may never be able to accommodate you, due to the energetic nature of the "strong" nuclear force (Quantum Chromo-Dynamics, QCD).Would "breaking" the proton into a bunch of pions be sufficient? I'm not sure this is known, but, at least as far as I know, it may be possible. (One must supply sufficient energy to create three anti-quarks, and a little extra to get them to separate. The hard part is getting this result rather than something like a proton and an anti-proton, or other somewhat similar result.)
could be either +1 or -1 if +1, then it is called proton if -1, then it is called hydride ion