if it is applicable and is accepted by all in its terms and is correct then it turns as a law
A theory and a law serve different purposes in science. A theory explains why something happens based on evidence and research, while a law describes a phenomenon or pattern observed in nature without necessarily explaining why it occurs. Therefore, a theory cannot "become" a law because they are fundamentally different in terms of their function and scope.
A scientific law is the description of a recurring event that occurs in nature. A scientific theory is an explanation of the law. The law does not change, but the theory may change when new data indicate that it needs to.
A theory that has been confirmed through rigorous testing and observation is typically referred to as a scientific law.
A scientific theory is an explanation supported by evidence and can be modified as new evidence is discovered. A scientific law is a description of a natural phenomenon that is consistent and often expressed mathematically, without explaining why it happens.
You're playing with words ... a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
Not at all. That it hasn't been proven is what makes it a theory. Once proven, it becomes a law.
command of sovereign sanctioned by punishments is law by imperative theory and law as legal science of norms is by pure theory of law.
A theory, when proven over time, can become a law. Example: Law of Gravity and Theory of Evolution
Pure Theory of Law was created in 1934.
A law is a description of a naturally occurring phenomenon, whereas a theory attempts to explain a law.
It was a law not the theory because this principle has also proved by him.
A law cannot become a theory, as laws are higher in scientific hierarchy than theories. Theories may become laws when the evidence for their factuality proves that the theory meets all established requirements set forth by the theory. If at any point in the scientific method a theory is disproven for the criteria that it sets forth, it can never be considered a Law. The hierarchy is thusly: Hypothesis < Theory < Law.
A theory explains how something works - a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
Ozone depletion is a theory. It is not a law because it is not passed to government.
The difference between theory and natural law is that a theory is a framework, while a natural law is a single rule, usually expressed in mathematics. They are not two different stages of acceptance among scientists (as it is sometimes claimed in error); they are two completely different things; a theory does not evolve into a law with when sufficient evidence for a theory has been gathered for example. For example consider: The Theory of Special Relativity <-- Theory Speed of light is constant <-- Law Theory of Electromagnetism <-- Theory Divergence of the Magnetic field is zero <-- Law Quantum Field Theory <-- Theory Conservation of Energy <-- Law
A theory is just an idea of how things work a law is a theory already proven that applies anywhere just depending of the variables used in the law
a law is something that is true and a theory is an opinion or thought that can be proven wrong.