Many People would be unable. The environment would be unable! Our Earth would eventually die out. Without air, nothing. :(
urm wed all die !
Adding air resistance would slow down the object's motion and reduce its acceleration. As a result, the object would take longer to reach its final velocity and experience a shorter range of motion compared to a scenario with no air resistance. Additionally, the object would experience a force in the opposite direction of its motion due to air resistance.
The net force would be the difference between the applied force and the air resistance. If the applied force is greater than the air resistance, then the net force would be in the direction of the applied force. If the air resistance is greater than the applied force, then the net force would be in the opposite direction.
The object with the largest surface area relative to its mass would be most affected by air resistance when falling. This means objects with a larger surface area, such as a feather or a sheet of paper, would experience more air resistance compared to objects with smaller surface areas, like a dense metal ball.
The resistance do obstruct the object. The object always travel slower with air resistance. Air resistance is higher with velocity and the object falling through air would have a limited velocity that it can't go through.
nowhere! Air resistance is all around us. Like math!
urm wed all die !
the mechanical advantage of a hot air balloon is this that we can use it in many good ways like it is for individual flight for every one, and can be use at any time but it depends on the air resistance + gravity because if the gravity is low the hot air balloon would fly far and far in the air and if the gravity is hifgh it would unable to fly and in air resistance if the air is high it would be difficult for a hot air balloon to fly and if air resistance is low it would be difficult for hot air balloon to fly in the air
Yes resistance would be a push force.
Yes, like flyswatters. they have holed to lower air resistance
You can call air resistance anything you like, but it isn't inertia. It's friction.
You can call air resistance anything you like, but it isn't inertia. It's friction.
Adding air resistance would slow down the object's motion and reduce its acceleration. As a result, the object would take longer to reach its final velocity and experience a shorter range of motion compared to a scenario with no air resistance. Additionally, the object would experience a force in the opposite direction of its motion due to air resistance.
The parachutist will go down, of course. If gravity is greater than air resistance, then the parachutist would accelerate (his speed would increase). This would increase air resistance, up to the point where gravity and air resistance are in balance.
The net force would be the difference between the applied force and the air resistance. If the applied force is greater than the air resistance, then the net force would be in the direction of the applied force. If the air resistance is greater than the applied force, then the net force would be in the opposite direction.
To fight off air resistance and go faster. If the airplane had a flat nose, (like your palm) the air resistance would affect the nose and make the plane slower, while a pointy nose allows the air resistance to pass by therefore making the plane go faster.
It requires a force to propel an object through air, because of the air resistance. Normally, if there were no air resistance and the object were being propelled on the level with no friction, a constant force would accelerate the object steadily. However, it would require a steady force to propel the object through air even without acceleration. And the faster it went the more resistance it would meet.