The one with the greatest mass has the greatest inertia. So, it will be the bowling ball.
B. A bowling ball has the greatest inertia because it has the most mass compared to the other objects listed. Inertia is directly related to an object's mass, with greater mass resulting in greater inertia.
The feather and tennis ball will fall at the same rate, hitting the ground at the same time due to gravity's influence on all objects regardless of their mass. However, the feather will experience more air resistance as it falls, which may slow it down slightly compared to the tennis ball.
I guess it has to do with how the earth's size is so huge and its gravity so overwhelming that we just can't notice any "pull" from other objects like boulders, buildings, etc. I have a related question. If you hang a bowling ball from a string there is zero gravity pulling sideways, right? Only down, but not sideways. So if you hang another bowling ball right next to the first one, both of them suspended by parallel strings, why won't they attract each other and touch each other if you bring them close enough together? But it seems that you can bring them a fraction of an inch away and they will not pull each other together to close that tiny distance and touch. Why not? They are both massive objects. Maybe they are not massive enough. The same experiment could be done with large spheres made of lead. A solid lead ball a foot in diameter would probably weigh over 100 pounds (just a guess). If you hang two such balls from steel cables, inside a building with no wind to disturb them, do you think you could see them attract each other if you brought them close enough? They say that if the Earth were the size of a bowling ball, then the moon would be the size of a tennis ball, and it would be 20 feet away. So why is it that if you have a solid rock sphere the size of a bowling ball and another the size of a tennis ball, you can't feel any gravitational attraction between them at 20 feet, or 1 foot, or even 1 inch, or even a tiny fraction of an inch. Or is there an attraction there, just too small to move any object, even one hanging on a string?
The brick would land first, followed by the tennis ball, and then the maple leaf. This is because the brick has more mass and therefore greater gravitational force acting on it, causing it to fall faster than the lighter objects.
The experimental setup I envision is as follows: you get a sheet of melamine, stick it in the middle of the school gym, set one end on a sawhorse to create the slope, put the two balls at the top of the slope, let go of them at the same time and measure to see which one goes farther once it gets out onto the gym floor. Right? Because of the weights of the two balls, the bowling ball will travel farther. It can store more energy from gravity.
sand grain
Bowling, curling, and tennis
Since the lightest tenpin bowling ball is currently 6 pounds and a table tennis ball is not even an ounce, the tenpin bowling ball is heavier.
a bowling ball
I believe it does. If you imagine it with a bowling ball and two tennis balls, when you roll one tennis ball into another stationary tennis ball, it rolls away, but not that far. Now repeat the same experiment with a bowling ball and a tennis ball, the result is much clearer as to which moved the stationary tennis ball more. The bowling ball did as it has a larger mass and size.
tennis ten pin bowling
tennis, golf, curling, bowling
An alley in tennis is the area between the single's line and double's line.
soccer, tennis
Tennis, bowling, archery.
B. A bowling ball has the greatest inertia because it has the most mass compared to the other objects listed. Inertia is directly related to an object's mass, with greater mass resulting in greater inertia.
Either bowling,swimming,tennis,or golf