answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The one with the greatest mass has the greatest inertia. So, it will be the Bowling ball.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

A tennis ball because its lighter

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which of the objects has the most gravitational force a sand grain a marble a bowling ball or tennis ball?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Physics

Which object has the greatest inertia A. a tennis ball B a bowling ball C a beach ball or D a volley ball?

Bowling Ball


What is the gravitational potential energy of a tennis ball if the height is 0.8 m and 0.57 kg?

the formulae for gravitational potential energy is =mgh,wher m=mass g=10 m/s2 and h=height.incomplete question.u should mention the height of the hill.it will be =057*10*height of the hill


Do light things go into the air more then heavy things do?

Yes, lighter objects weigh less, therefore causing them to stay aloft in the air for a longer period of time. For example, (and this isn't exact, just an example) you can throw a 5 ounce tennis ball higher into the air than you can throw a 13 pound bowling ball.


If you roll a bowling ball and a tennis ball with the same amount of force which will go further?

The experimental setup I envision is as follows: you get a sheet of melamine, stick it in the middle of the school gym, set one end on a sawhorse to create the slope, put the two balls at the top of the slope, let go of them at the same time and measure to see which one goes farther once it gets out onto the gym floor. Right? Because of the weights of the two balls, the bowling ball will travel farther. It can store more energy from gravity.


Why cant you feel the force of gravity from the objects surrounding you?

I guess it has to do with how the earth's size is so huge and its gravity so overwhelming that we just can't notice any "pull" from other objects like boulders, buildings, etc. I have a related question. If you hang a bowling ball from a string there is zero gravity pulling sideways, right? Only down, but not sideways. So if you hang another bowling ball right next to the first one, both of them suspended by parallel strings, why won't they attract each other and touch each other if you bring them close enough together? But it seems that you can bring them a fraction of an inch away and they will not pull each other together to close that tiny distance and touch. Why not? They are both massive objects. Maybe they are not massive enough. The same experiment could be done with large spheres made of lead. A solid lead ball a foot in diameter would probably weigh over 100 pounds (just a guess). If you hang two such balls from steel cables, inside a building with no wind to disturb them, do you think you could see them attract each other if you brought them close enough? They say that if the Earth were the size of a bowling ball, then the moon would be the size of a tennis ball, and it would be 20 feet away. So why is it that if you have a solid rock sphere the size of a bowling ball and another the size of a tennis ball, you can't feel any gravitational attraction between them at 20 feet, or 1 foot, or even 1 inch, or even a tiny fraction of an inch. Or is there an attraction there, just too small to move any object, even one hanging on a string?