The cost of production of electricity from a thermal power plant is more than that of the hydroelectricity so the later is more used if both the source are available.
Well, hydro electricity is cheaper because on on hand you don't have to burn fossil fuels in order to rotate the turbine and on the other hand you don't have to pay for it's drawbacks ( for example nuclear waste is very expensive to be thrown away). I should add that in some countries like those in middle east especially the Arab ones, as fossil fuel is very cheap and available, they mostly use it rather than other nature friendlier kinds of energy.
A large balloon typically has more thermal energy than a small balloon because it has more mass and therefore more particles that can store thermal energy.
The hot cup of coffee has more thermal energy than an iceberg. This is because thermal energy is directly related to temperature, and the cup of coffee is at a much higher temperature than the iceberg, meaning it contains more thermal energy.
Yes, a small object can have more thermal energy than a larger object if it has a higher temperature. Thermal energy is directly proportional to temperature, so even though the larger object has more mass, the smaller object could have a higher temperature and therefore more thermal energy.
A black hole would have more thermal energy than the moon.
hydro electricity is better than normal electricity because it is cheaper.
A difficult question because a company that makes hydro electricity would not sell it any cheaper than conventional electricity. It needs oil to be a lot more expensive than the present glut price for hydro electricity to be economic.
That cannot be said with certainty. In the year 2300, there may be more buildings than now. A lot of electricity will come from hydroelectricity or geothermal energy.
Hydroelectricity does what all electricity does. Hydro refers to the source of the electricity (generated by moving water) rather than the nature of the electric current itself.
100 percent of the electricity generated in Niger is produced in thermal generating plants using fossil fuels.
its proven that it is more harmful to not use it than to use it
China uses more hydroelectricity than any other country because it has abundant water resources that can be harnessed for generating electricity. The country's development and industrialization have also increased its energy demand, pushing it to utilize hydroelectric power as a reliable and renewable energy source. Additionally, the Chinese government has invested significantly in building large-scale hydroelectric projects to meet the country's growing energy needs.
Cost per unit of electricity depends the type of generation used. ie:- thermal hydel, nuclear etc. hydel electricity is cheaper and now a days it cost less than Rs.10 per unit in India. whereas thermal electricity cost less than Rs. 20 per unit
No, copper is a better conductor of electricity than nickel. This is because copper has lower electrical resistance and higher thermal conductivity compared to nickel, making it a more efficient material for conducting electricity.
Well, hydro electricity is cheaper because on on hand you don't have to burn fossil fuels in order to rotate the turbine and on the other hand you don't have to pay for it's drawbacks ( for example nuclear waste is very expensive to be thrown away). I should add that in some countries like those in middle east especially the Arab ones, as fossil fuel is very cheap and available, they mostly use it rather than other nature friendlier kinds of energy.
More than 65% of India's electricity generation capacity comes from thermal power plants, with about 85% of the country's thermal power generation being coal-based. The 10 largest thermal power stations operating in India are all coal-fired, with seven of them owned and operated by state-run National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC).
A large balloon typically has more thermal energy than a small balloon because it has more mass and therefore more particles that can store thermal energy.