Soliloquies are necessary in plays because they express the feelings that the characters cant express in front of others, like asides.
Constantly. Choruses, Soliloquys and long set speeches are all monologues.
Hamlet is notorious for having a number of soliloquys. You need to specify which one.
When actors delivered soliloquys on the Elizabethan stage, it is believed that they made eye contact with the audience and spoke directly to them, thus engaging the audience in the character's inner dialogues. The fourth wall convention was not as firm as it later came to be.
He should tell himself that it is not his fault because as the three witches prophesied, it is fate and fate is inevitable.
Good question. Soliloquys are usually reserved for major characters, which is to say, the protagonist and the antagonist. In Hamlet, Hamlet the protagonist gets five soliloquys and Claudius the antagonist gets one. In Othello, it's the other way around: Iago gets all the soliloquys. Minor characters rarely get them. An early and peculiar example to the contrary is Launce's scene with his dog in The Two Gentlemen of Verona, but that was supposed to be a comic turn. You can see why this is. Suppose Shakespeare had written a soliloquy for Ophelia after she has been set as the bait in the trap for Hamlet. Perhaps she could talk about how she is torn between obeying her father and her love of Hamlet. Perhaps she could speculate about the meaning of loyalty. Perhaps she could talk about how she feels about being used in this way. If she did any of this she would suddenly stop being a supporting character and become a main character, because her conflicts and problems are brought to the fore and become what the audience is concentrating on and cares about. Indeed the play could become the play Ophelia rather than the play Hamlet.
I don't think you understand something very basic about writers. They are not necessarily characters in the works they write. We do not worry about whether Edward loves Bella or Stephanie Meyer. We do not ask whether Obi Wan Kenobi speaks better than George Lucas. And Shakespeare does not have soliloquys, although he writes them for his characters like Hamlet. Shakespeare is not a character in any play he wrote (although he is sometimes a character in other peoples' plays, as he is in Shakespeare in Love). In any case, "Hamlet's soliloquy" is meaningless. Hamlet has five soliloquys: "O that this too too solid flesh would melt", "O what a rogue and peasant slave am I", "To be or not to be, that is the question", "Now is the very witching time of night" and "How all occasions do inform against me." Unless you specify which one you are talking about, nobody can answer your question.
A soliloquy serves to reveal a character's inner thoughts and emotions to the audience, providing insight into their motivations and conflicts. It allows the character to express their feelings and dilemmas without the influence of other characters, often advancing the plot or deepening thematic elements. This dramatic device creates a more intimate connection between the character and the audience, enhancing the overall understanding of the narrative.
I do not know about the first part of the 16th century, but Shakespeare wrote plays at the end of this century and his plays are still performed so the theater has not changed all that much. There were more soliloquys and asides then than there are today. Lighting is better and women appear on the stage nowadays. Of course, there was no TV and no movies and acting in movies or TV is quite different that the stage, but that is not what you asked about.
A soliloquy is a speech given by a character when there is nobody on stage to hear him. It is sometimes played as the character musing aloud, and sometimes as the character breaking the fourth wall and speaking directly to the audience. Famous soliloquys in Shakespeare include: Hamlet's five famous soliloquys: "O that this too too solid flesh would melt" in 1, 2; "O what a rogue and peasant slave am I" in 2,2; "To be or not to be" in 3,1; "Now is the very witching hour of night" in 3,2; "How all occasions do inform against me" in 4,4. Macbeth's "Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow creeps in this petty pace from day to day." Richard III's opening speech: "Now is the winter of our discontent made glorious summer by this sun of York." Juliet's soliloquy in 3,2 "Gallop apace, you fiery-footed steeds" Edmund in King Lear: "Now God, stand up for bastards!" Viola's "Ring Speech" in Twelfth Night 2,2 "I left no ring with her. What means this lady?"
Lighting and special effects wouldn't have been an option for the cast at the Globe Theatre. A basic set, costumes and props is all the cast would have had to perform Shakespeare's works. The actor's skill alone would have to transform the bland stage in the middle of the day, into a scene that could take place at night, etc. This is precisely the reason for the eloquent speech and descriptions of the settings in the dialogues, monologues, and soliloquys in Shakespeare's plays.
It is the opening line of a famous Shakespearean soliloquy from the play Hamlet, Act 3 Scene 1. Some people think that in this speech Hamlet debates whether it is better to kill himself, or go on living in misery. Others think that he is talking about whether to risk death by pursuing his revenge. Still more would say that it is not about Hamlet specifically at all, but rather about the human tendency to hang on to life no matter how awful it is (You will note that, unlike all his other soliloquys, Hamlet never uses the words "I" or "me" in this one).
Important to you is a statement Important to you? is a question..