0
If the president ignores the rulings of the Supreme Court, it can lead to a constitutional crisis and undermine the system of checks and balances in the government. The Supreme Court's decisions are legally binding and must be followed by all branches of government to uphold the rule of law.
What else can I help you with?
Recent Supreme Court rulings have indicated that affirmative action programs in schools .?
Recent Supreme Court rulings have upheld the use of affirmative action programs in schools but have also imposed limitations on their implementation, such as emphasizing that race cannot be the decisive factor in admissions decisions. The rulings aim to strike a balance between promoting diversity and ensuring that the programs are narrowly tailored and do not result in quotas or discrimination against other groups.
How does the power to change the size of the Supreme Court impact the balance of judicial authority and decision-making?
The power to change the size of the Supreme Court can impact the balance of judicial authority and decision-making by potentially shifting the ideological composition of the Court. Increasing or decreasing the number of justices can influence the Court's rulings and the direction of its decisions, as new appointments can alter the prevailing ideologies and perspectives on legal issues. This can ultimately impact the balance of power within the Court and shape the outcomes of important cases.
What was the US Supreme Court's reasoning in the Marbury v Madison case?
The rulings in Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803) are related to the three questions posed to the Court. Chief Justice John Marshall reasoned:Has the applicant a right to the commission he demands?The Court determined that Marbury had a right to his commission, per An Act Concerning the District of Columbia that Congress passed in 1801, as well as Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, which granted the President the right to make judicial nominations. Marbury's nomination had already been approved by the Senate, then signed an sealed by the former President, making it official.If he has a right, and that right has been violated, do the laws of his country afford him a remedy?Because the answer to the first question was that Marbury was properly appointed as a justice of the peace, his legal rights had been violated when Madison withheld the paperwork necessary to assume office.Further, the laws of the United States afforded Marbury a remedy to this violation.If they do afford him a remedy, is it a mandamus issuing from this court?The Supreme Court determined it did not have original jurisdiction over the case, but appellate, and therefore could not issue a writ of mandamus. Marbury had to initiate legal action against Madison in the lower federal courts before the Supreme Court could review his case.This decision was based on the Court's determination that the Judiciary Act of 1789, in which Congress delegated to the Supreme Court original jurisdiction over cases involving the federal government, was partially unconstitutional because it granted the Court powers not specified by the Constitution.Part 3 of the Marbury decision established the high court's right of judicial review over legislation passed by Congress and the President, as well as the power to overturn laws deemed to be unconstitutional.
How was Italian renaissance law corrupt?
During the Italian Renaissance, corruption in law was prevalent due to practices such as bribery, favoritism, and nepotism among officials. The lack of accountability and oversight often led to unjust rulings and decisions that favored the powerful elite. Additionally, the merging of political power with the legal system further contributed to the corruption of justice.
Should justices take a more activist approach or be more restraint when it comes down to Supreme Court decisions?
Supreme Court Justices should read the plain text of the Constitution, and rule in accordance with the Constitution. Too many lawyers and judges do not LIKE the Constitution, and base their rulings on what they WISH it said, rather than what it actually DOES say. For example, the plain text of the document allows eighteen "Enumerated Powers" of Congress, as listed in Article 1 Section 8. The Federal government can do nothing more. However, about 95% of what the US Federal Government is not authorized by the Constitution. Education. Health insurance. Drug laws. ALL of these are unconstitutional, because the Constitution does not allow the Federal government a role in these matters. They are entirely left to the States, or to the People. In fact, the 9th and 10th Amendments in the Bill of Rights explicitly state "And No More!"
Who enforces US Supreme Court rulings when they are against the President and the President refuses?
Whenever a U. S. President is in violation of the law as interpreted by the U. S. Supreme Court (or even if he/she is in violation of a law that the Supreme Court has not tested), it is the responsibility of Congress to impeach him/her.
What are the major strengths and weaknesses of the US Supreme Court in influencing social policies in the US?
Do you want that answered by the way things are today or by the way the Foundersenvisioned? First, I'm not sure its the Supreme Court's job to "influence social policies". The duty of the Supreme Court is tointerruptlaw as declared by the U.S. Constitution.The strengths are the justice do not serve terms therefore they are not restricted by the ballot box and can vote as they see the law. The rulings of the Supreme Court are beyond appeal.The weakness is the Supreme Court depends on the President to enforce its rulings and Congress to ensure the president does it.
Supreme Court rulings are made by what?
Simple majority
How did the supreme court rulings in 1883 work against the civil rights of 1875?
The Supreme Court rulings said civil rights were decided by state and local law.
What historic legal document are most US Supreme Court rulings based on?
The US Constitution is the historic legal document that most US Supreme Court rulings are based on.
Could the President or a state Governor veto the ruling of the Supreme Court as unconstitutional?
No. The rulings of the Supreme Court represent the final interpretation of a law. The only way to change the interpretation is to change the law, which is the job of the legislative branch.
How many requirements are there for the supreme court?
The requirements for the supreme court is to ensure they are following the constitution in all rulings.
Can the president overrule the state courts?
No. Rulings from states are only overruled if the decision is taken to the Supreme Court.. The court doesn't take all cases. The president does not have anything to do with any of this nor is he able to as set by the constitution .
Who provides final rulings on the constitutionality of states and local laws?
The Supreme Court provides final rulings on the constitutionality of state and local laws.
Who provides final rulings on the constitutionality of state and local laws?
The Supreme Court provides final rulings on the constitutionality of state and local laws.
Who provides final rulings on the constitutionally of state and local laws?
The Supreme Court provides final rulings on the constitutionality of state and local laws.
Who provides final rulings on the constitutionality of the state and local laws?
The Supreme Court provides final rulings on the constitutionality of state and local laws.
