A narrow interpretation would be to look at the words drafted and what the writer intended, whereas a broad interpretation would be the inference of the words drafted.
Yes, history is the study of the past events that have shaped societies, cultures, and civilizations. It encompasses a wide range of topics such as political movements, social changes, technological advancements, and cultural developments.
The historical thinking skill of interpretation is important for historians because it allows them to analyze, evaluate, and draw conclusions from historical evidence. By interpreting the past, historians can uncover different perspectives, gain insights into why events occurred, and make sense of complex historical narratives. This skill is crucial for constructing accurate and meaningful historical interpretations.
a:the dissolving of only salt A was endothermic b:the dissolving of only B was endothermic c:the dissolving of both salt a and A and salt B was endothermic d:the dissolving of salt A was exothermic and the dissolving of salt B was endhothermic
The Taliban restricts women's rights due to their strict interpretation of Islamic law, which dictates that women should have limited roles in society and should adhere to traditional gender roles.
Republicans can win the popular vote in elections by receiving more votes from the general public than their opponents. This can be achieved by appealing to a broad base of voters, having a strong campaign strategy, and effectively communicating their policies and values to the electorate.
wide ranger for interpretation
loose construction
loose construction
alexander mmg
it would be narrow because they only veto un constitutional laws
Peter G. Broad has written: 'El ojo en la sombra' -- subject(s): Criticism and interpretation
He favored a broad interpretation of the Constitution.
A broad interpretation of the Constitution would be one that allows a considerable amount of flexibility. A narrow interpretation would tend to interpret the laws in the most literal sense. Anti-Federalists like Thomas Jefferson favored a strict interpretation, and were against loose interpretation because it meant stepping outside the boundaries, and assuming more power than had been granted. The Federalists, on the other hand, favored a more ambiguous interpretation that would allow to the government to assume additional power when needed.
Depending on how broad your interpretation of "earn" is, it can be a wage tax, a payroll tax, or an income tax.
Liberal Constructionist
The Supreme Court used a broad interpretation of the Constitution when reaching its decision in Gibbons v. Ogden,(1824). A broad interpretation creates a precedent that is applicable to many cases, as opposed to a narrow interpretation, which may address only the instant case or a small range of cases.In Gibbons, Chief Justice Marshall held Congress had sole authority to regulate commerce between the states, and asserted the supremacy of federal law over state law when the two are in conflict (per the Article VI Supremacy Clause).Case Citation:Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)
It's your interpretation of the constitution. The philosophy that allows narrow constitutional interpretation is called strict construction and the philosophy of broad constitutional interpretation is called loose construction. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison favored the strict constructions, and Alexander Hamilton favored the loose construction.