Through a series of protests and reforms.
Through a series of protests and reforms.
Answer 1Authoritarianism is absolute rule by one, usually a Dictator or Monarch and Democracy is rule by all or by every citizen having a say in what is done.Answer 2The difference between an authoritarian and democratic government is the power held by its leaders. In an authoritarian government, power entails suppression of the opposition and human rights. In a democratic government, on the other hand, power is spread between different institutions that act as a check and balance on each other.
solidarity
The emergence of democratic opposition to authoritarian governments in Africa has rested on several key factors, including widespread economic discontent, civil society mobilization, and the influence of global democratic norms. Increased access to information and communication technologies has empowered citizens to organize and advocate for change. Additionally, international support for democratic movements and pressure on authoritarian regimes have played significant roles in fostering opposition. Collectively, these elements have contributed to a growing demand for political accountability and human rights across the continent.
The people could not choose or change their rulers. There was no real freedom to express one's view.
Solidarity, a Polish labor group formed in 1980 that struggled peacefully for democratic change.
Yes it is called a democratic election.
Yes, it is a democratic society.
Frustration in Poland stemmed from various factors, including economic disparities, political corruption, and a lack of democratic freedoms under communist rule. The Solidarity movement, led by Lech Wałęsa in the 1980s, galvanized public discontent and demanded reforms, ultimately leading to the fall of communism in 1989. This shift marked a significant change, as it paved the way for a democratic government and economic transformation, aligning Poland more closely with Western Europe. The transition sparked both hope and challenges as the country navigated its new identity and integration into the European Union.
Ans: People face various difficulties in a non-democratic country as we have seen in case of Chile, Myanmar, Ghana, Pakistan, Poland, Nepal etc. These difficulties because of the different reasons as mentioned below: >> In non-democratic countries, the people have no security of life. For example, in Chile thousands of people were killed by military rulers. >> People are not free to express their opinions. Criticizing the government or rulers in a non-democratic country would lead to severe punishments. >> There is no freedom for the people either to elect their government or to be elected. Even if they find any government or ruler not to their benefit or well-being, they can not change it since there is no election. >> In non-democratic countries no opposition parties or opposition leader is tolerated. >> As we have seen in Poland during the regime of a non-democratic government, the workers are not allowed to form their independent Trade Unions. Only such unions can survive which rightly or wrongly support the policies of the government. >> In absence of a democratic government there is no socio-economic equality. Societies in such countries remain divided among privileged and non-privileged classes which result in corruption in every department of the government. Ordinary people can not aspire for any post. People are always at the mercy of the autocratic ruler or the dictator.
An example of a nonviolent unsuccessful method is the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests in China. Despite the peaceful demonstrations advocating for democratic reforms and greater freedoms, the movement was met with a violent crackdown by the government. The protesters' calls for change were ultimately suppressed, and the government maintained its authoritarian control, highlighting the limitations of nonviolent resistance in the face of state violence.
Democratic Corporatism is where a government gives public dollars to private bankers, insurance and drug firms, in the hope that such largesse will compel those firms to change.