There are plenty of arguments against cloning - especially against cloning humans - ranging from scientific issues, to the practicality of cloning, to religious objections.
On the scientific side, we see that a large percentage of cloning efforts end in failure. For example, it took hundreds of attempts to clone Dolly the sheep. Often clones don't live as long as sexually reproduced animals, possibly because the genes taken from adults are more likely to have undergone mutations.
Another scientific argument is that genetic diversity helps provide the "pool" of variations available for a robust human population. It is commonly known that inbreeding animals constantly can result in reduced variations and an increased risk of genetic defects. An example is hip displasia in purebred dogs. Mutts tend to be more adaptable and healthier.
On the practical side, it is far easier to reproduce naturally than to create individuals through cloning. And it is vastly more practical to have a child within the context of marriage and a family than in a laboratory.
On the religious side, there is the fact that every human life is precious in God's eyes and, whether cloned or created naturally, deserves to live as a valuable member of God's kingdom. Just as each member of a pair of identical twins has a soul, so would a clone.
Those who favor cloning humans argue that we could produce more geniuses and thereby improve life for everyone through their contributions. Some argue that we could produce clones to provide "spare parts" for people who need transplants.
There is no proof that someone who is genetically identical to Albert Einstein, for example, would be a genius or would use his genius for socially acceptable ends. Upbringing and environment could turn an Einstein clone into another Adolf Hitler.
As for spare parts, it would be no more ethical to use a clone for that purpose than it would be to use your next door neighbor.
There are two passages in The Bible that bear directly on the issue of men playing God. The first is in Genesis, when Adam and Eve were thrown out of the Garden of Eden for taking fruit from the tree of knowledge and presuming to obtain God's wisdom.
Also, in Genesis 11 is the story of the Tower of Babel. Humans, with the help of a common language, were on the verge of building a tower all the way to Heaven. But God did not approve:
"The LORD said, 'If as one people speaking the same language they have begun to do this, then nothing they plan to do will be impossible for them. Come, let us go down and confuse their language so they will not understand each other.'"
Taken together, the arguments against cloning seem to outweigh any good that could be obtained from the process.
The one benefit of animal cloning that will have the biggest impact on our environment is that with the technology of cloning, we can now preserve endangered breeds and species.
Arguments against therapeutic cloning include concerns about the destruction of human embryos, ethical considerations regarding the creation and manipulation of human life, and potential risks of genetic abnormalities or unintended consequences in the cloned cells. Additionally, there are challenges in regulating and overseeing the use of therapeutic cloning to ensure it is used responsibly and ethically.
Christians are against cloning because its like you're playing God if you clone because God can only give life.
hello,some were shocked.· 89% believed that the cloning of human beings was not morally right· 66% believed that the cloning of animals was not morally right· 69% are scared by the connotations of cloning humans· 74% believe that cloning is going against God's will· 19% disagree with the statement that cloning is against God's will· 6% of Americans are in favor of human cloning
cose their fools
people like mushoe pork on wensdays The, "Stop Cloning Act" of 1997
Arguments against economic integration world leader command?
There are no real, good arguments against planning. Having a plan is important in many cases.
The implications that it is morally repugnant are something that also came with the invention of IVF. In the '60s and '70s 85% of Americans thought it should be illegal. They claimed it was unsafe, families would be destroyed, and it was against God's will. These are the same exact arguments of those opposing cloning. All their opinions changed when they saw Louie Brown, the first child born using IVF. People noticed he was totally normal. Why should the same not be true for cloning?
are you for or against voluntary work
There are many arguments for and against DNA evidence. One argument is that it cannot be disproved as deciding evidence.
Celibacy is abstinence from sex or sexual relations. There are arguments for it to protect people from unwanted pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases and religious purity. There are arguments against it saying that it is restrictive and that it goes against following the laws of nature.