In a Dictatorship, voting rights are typically limited to a select group, often restricted to members of the ruling party or those loyal to the regime. Elections, if held, are usually tightly controlled, with little genuine competition or choice for voters. The timing and frequency of elections can vary, often determined by the ruling authority rather than a democratic process. Ultimately, the goal is usually to legitimize the regime rather than to reflect the will of the people.
there really is none the only similarity is that sometimes in a dictatorship you vote for the dictator and in a parlimentary democracy you vote for representatives
A dictatorship is a definition of a state in wich the government has 'dictates' its will. This definition includes the former Soviet union, Khadaffi's regime and Hitlers nazi Germany. These regimes were dictatorships although they regularly (some) held votes. So the right to vote has nothing to do with the definition of a dictatorship.
The dictator decides who gets to do what.
Unless I'm living under a rock Cuba is a dictatorship
No, the country is an absolute dictatorship.
According to Syrian Law, all people above the age of 18 can vote. In practice, Syria is a dictatorship and nobody votes.
A dictatorship is when there is a single person, or small group that takes over a government and controlls the country. A democracy is when people vote for their leaders and can change government policy.
Dictatorship.
Everyone does NOT have to vote. The individual has the choice, vote or don't vote. Besides, you don't vote for a Prime Minister. You vote for a political party. The party of your choice. The leader of the party which wins (the one which gets most votes) the election will become Prime Minister. If you didn't give the population the choice every few years to keep or dismiss the party in power then what you would have would be a dictatorship or a 1 party state, which amounts to the same thing. It's called democracy.
A dictator was appointed for a matter of months, not years. Six months was the standard time allotted for him to get his job done. However the dictatorship could be renewed by a vote of the senate. Julius Caesar was the exception, as even though his dictatorship had been renewed, he was also made perpetual dictator.A dictator was appointed for a matter of months, not years. Six months was the standard time allotted for him to get his job done. However the dictatorship could be renewed by a vote of the senate. Julius Caesar was the exception, as even though his dictatorship had been renewed, he was also made perpetual dictator.A dictator was appointed for a matter of months, not years. Six months was the standard time allotted for him to get his job done. However the dictatorship could be renewed by a vote of the senate. Julius Caesar was the exception, as even though his dictatorship had been renewed, he was also made perpetual dictator.A dictator was appointed for a matter of months, not years. Six months was the standard time allotted for him to get his job done. However the dictatorship could be renewed by a vote of the senate. Julius Caesar was the exception, as even though his dictatorship had been renewed, he was also made perpetual dictator.A dictator was appointed for a matter of months, not years. Six months was the standard time allotted for him to get his job done. However the dictatorship could be renewed by a vote of the senate. Julius Caesar was the exception, as even though his dictatorship had been renewed, he was also made perpetual dictator.A dictator was appointed for a matter of months, not years. Six months was the standard time allotted for him to get his job done. However the dictatorship could be renewed by a vote of the senate. Julius Caesar was the exception, as even though his dictatorship had been renewed, he was also made perpetual dictator.A dictator was appointed for a matter of months, not years. Six months was the standard time allotted for him to get his job done. However the dictatorship could be renewed by a vote of the senate. Julius Caesar was the exception, as even though his dictatorship had been renewed, he was also made perpetual dictator.A dictator was appointed for a matter of months, not years. Six months was the standard time allotted for him to get his job done. However the dictatorship could be renewed by a vote of the senate. Julius Caesar was the exception, as even though his dictatorship had been renewed, he was also made perpetual dictator.A dictator was appointed for a matter of months, not years. Six months was the standard time allotted for him to get his job done. However the dictatorship could be renewed by a vote of the senate. Julius Caesar was the exception, as even though his dictatorship had been renewed, he was also made perpetual dictator.
Both don't allow people to vote and a higher noble person rules the country.
the dictator gets to chop the peoples heads off but you can get half price on a watermelon